Thief, Beware of What Get You There: Towards Understanding Model Extraction Attack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model extraction increasingly attracts research attentions as keeping commercial AI models private can retain a competitive advantage. In some scenarios, AI models are trained proprietarily, where neither pre-trained models nor sufficient in-distribution data is publicly available. Model extraction attacks against these models are typically more devastating. Therefore, in this paper, we empirically investigate the behaviors of model extraction under such scenarios. We find the effectiveness of existing techniques significantly affected by the absence of pre-trained models. In addition, the impacts of the attacker's hyperparameters, e.g. model architecture and optimizer, as well as the utilities of information retrieved from queries, are counterintuitive. We provide some insights on explaining the possible causes of these phenomena. With these observations, we formulate model extraction attacks into an adaptive framework that captures these factors with deep reinforcement learning. Experiments show that the proposed framework can be used to improve existing techniques, and show that model extraction is still possible in such strict scenarios. Our research can help system designers to construct better defense strategies based on their scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,077
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
16 more
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 381
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutionscited by 254
- 2018Differentiable MPC for End-to-end Planning and Controlcited by 189
- 2019Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIscited by 139
- 2017Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Deep Neural Networkscited by 136
- 2019Zero-Shot Knowledge Distillation in Deep Networkscited by 121
- 2018Knowledge Distillation with Adversarial Samples Supporting Decision Boundarycited by 49
- 2017Model Extraction Warning in MLaaS Paradigmcited by 40
- 2019A Simple Explanation for the Existence of Adversarial Examples with Small Hamming Distancecited by 32
- 2020Neural Networks Are More Productive Teachers Than Human Raters: Active Mixup for Data-Efficient Knowledge Distillation from a Blackbox Modelcited by 28
- 2019Extraction of Complex DNN Models: Real Threat or Boogeyman?cited by 19
- 2017MBMF: Model-Based Priors for Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
- 2023A Survey on Privacy in Graph Neural Networks: Attacks, Preservation, and Applicationscited by 22
- 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Workcited by 21
- 2025DOGe: Defensive Output Generation for LLM Protection Against Knowledge Distillationcited by 14
- 2025Evolving Security in LLMs: A Study of Jailbreak Attacks and Defensescited by 8
- 2026CITED: A Decision Boundary-Aware Signature for GNNs Towards Model Extraction Defensecited by 3
- 2025Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attackscited by 0
- 2025I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attackscited by 0
- 2026CITED: A Decision Boundary-Aware Signature for GNNs Towards Model Extraction Defense23 Feb 2026
- 2025I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attacks29 Aug 2025
- 2025DOGe: Defensive Output Generation for LLM Protection Against Knowledge Distillation26 May 2025
- 2025Evolving Security in LLMs: A Study of Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses2 Apr 2025
- 2025Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attacks8 Mar 2025
- 2023A Survey on Privacy in Graph Neural Networks: Attacks, Preservation, and Applications31 Aug 2023
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems21 Sep 2022
- 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defences16 Jun 2022
- 2022Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Work23 Jan 2022