A-FMI: Learning Attributions from Deep Networks via Feature Map Importance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-based attribution methods can aid in the understanding of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, the redundancy of attribution features and the gradient saturation problem, which weaken the ability to identify significant features and cause an explanation focus shift, are challenges that attribution methods still face. In this work, we propose: 1) an essential characteristic, Strong Relevance, when selecting attribution features; 2) a new concept, feature map importance (FMI), to refine the contribution of each feature map, which is faithful to the CNN model; and 3) a novel attribution method via FMI, termed A-FMI, to address the gradient saturation problem, which couples the target image with a reference image, and assigns the FMI to the difference-from-reference at the granularity of feature map. Through visual inspections and qualitative evaluations on the ImageNet dataset, we show the compelling advantages of A-FMI on its faithfulness, insensitivity to the choice of reference, class discriminability, and superior explanation performance compared with popular attribution methods across varying CNN architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2021.
Builds on
29 of 34 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
17 more
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 334
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
- 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
- 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
- 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
- 2016Understanding and Improving Convolutional Neural Networks via Concatenated Rectified Linear Unitscited by 86
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.