mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cross-Lingual Word Embedding Refinement by ℓ1 Norm Optimisation

arXiv 2104.04916 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.LG stat.MLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings (CLWEs) encode words from two or more languages in a shared high-dimensional space in which vectors representing words with similar meaning (regardless of language) are closely located. Existing methods for building high-quality CLWEs learn mappings that minimise the ℓ2 norm loss function. However, this optimisation objective has been demonstrated to be sensitive to outliers. Based on the more robust Manhattan norm (aka. ℓ1 norm) goodness-of-fit criterion, this paper proposes a simple post-processing step to improve CLWEs. An advantage of this approach is that it is fully agnostic to the training process of the original CLWEs and can therefore be applied widely. Extensive experiments are performed involving ten diverse languages and embeddings trained on different corpora. Evaluation results based on bilingual lexicon induction and cross-lingual transfer for natural language inference tasks show that the ℓ1 refinement substantially outperforms four state-of-the-art baselines in both supervised and unsupervised settings. It is therefore recommended that this strategy be adopted as a standard for CLWE methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2021.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  2. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  3. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  4. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
  5. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
  6. 2013Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translationcited by 187
  7. 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
  8. 2018A robust self-learning method for fully unsupervised cross-lingual mappings of word embeddingscited by 145
  9. 2017A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Modelscited by 142
  10. 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 119
  11. 2017Offline bilingual word vectors, orthogonal transformations and the inverted softmaxcited by 94
  12. 2018Loss in Translation: Learning Bilingual Word Mapping with a Retrieval Criterioncited by 69
9 more
  1. 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
  2. 2019How to (Properly) Evaluate Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings: On Strong Baselines, Comparative Analyses, and Some Misconceptionscited by 48
  3. 2019Cross-lingual Alignment vs Joint Training: A Comparative Study and A Simple Unified Frameworkcited by 26
  4. 2018Non-Adversarial Unsupervised Word Translationcited by 19
  5. 2016Cross-lingual Models of Word Embeddings: An Empirical Comparisoncited by 12
  6. 2019Density Matching for Bilingual Word Embeddingcited by 11
  7. 2018A Discriminative Latent-Variable Model for Bilingual Lexicon Inductioncited by 8
  8. 2021Summarising Historical Text in Modern Languagescited by 6
  9. 2019Weakly-Supervised Concept-based Adversarial Learning for Cross-lingual Word Embeddingscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.