Uncertainty-aware Remaining Useful Life predictor
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation is the problem of inferring how long a certain industrial asset can be expected to operate within its defined specifications. Deploying successful RUL prediction methods in real-life applications is a prerequisite for the design of intelligent maintenance strategies with the potential of drastically reducing maintenance costs and machine downtimes. In light of their superior performance in a wide range of engineering fields, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are natural candidates to tackle the challenges involved in the design of intelligent maintenance systems. In particular, given the potentially catastrophic consequences or substantial costs associated with maintenance decisions that are either too late or too early, it is desirable that ML algorithms provide uncertainty estimates alongside their predictions. However, standard data-driven methods used for uncertainty estimation in RUL problems do not scale well to large datasets or are not sufficiently expressive to model the high-dimensional mapping from raw sensor data to RUL estimates. In this work, we consider Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) as possible solutions to the aforementioned limitations. We perform a thorough evaluation and comparison of several variants of DGPs applied to RUL predictions. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated on the N-CMAPSS (New Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation) dataset from NASA for aircraft engines. The results show that the proposed methods are able to provide very accurate RUL predictions along with sensible uncertainty estimates, providing more reliable solutions for (safety-critical) real-life industrial applications.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2021.
Builds on
20 of 72 references.
References · 20
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
- 2015Probabilistic Backpropagation for Scalable Learning of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 295
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 226
- 2017Doubly Stochastic Variational Inference for Deep Gaussian Processescited by 143
- 2016Stochastic Variational Deep Kernel Learningcited by 92
8 more
- 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
- 2018Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Batch Normalized Deep Networkscited by 70
- 2016Understanding Probabilistic Sparse Gaussian Process Approximationscited by 68
- 2020Potential, Challenges and Future Directions for Deep Learning in Prognostics and Health Management Applicationscited by 63
- 2020Fusing Physics-based and Deep Learning Models for Prognosticscited by 39
- 2019Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction via Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 30
- 2020Deep Sigma Point Processescited by 16
- 2019Parametric Gaussian Process Regressorscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.