PQA: Perceptual Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Perceptual organization remains one of the very few established theories on the human visual system. It underpinned many pre-deep seminal works on segmentation and detection, yet research has seen a rapid decline since the preferential shift to learning deep models. Of the limited attempts, most aimed at interpreting complex visual scenes using perceptual organizational rules. This has however been proven to be sub-optimal, since models were unable to effectively capture the visual complexity in real-world imagery. In this paper, we rejuvenate the study of perceptual organization, by advocating two positional changes: (i) we examine purposefully generated synthetic data, instead of complex real imagery, and (ii) we ask machines to synthesize novel perceptually-valid patterns, instead of explaining existing data. Our overall answer lies with the introduction of a novel visual challenge -- the challenge of perceptual question answering (PQA). Upon observing example perceptual question-answer pairs, the goal for PQA is to solve similar questions by generating answers entirely from scratch (see Figure 1). Our first contribution is therefore the first dataset of perceptual question-answer pairs, each generated specifically for a particular Gestalt principle. We then borrow insights from human psychology to design an agent that casts perceptual organization as a self-attention problem, where a proposed grid-to-grid mapping network directly generates answer patterns from scratch. Experiments show our agent to outperform a selection of naive and strong baselines. A human study however indicates that ours uses astronomically more data to learn when compared to an average human, necessitating future research (with or without our dataset).
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2021.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
- 2019Unsupervised Learning of Probably Symmetric Deformable 3D Objects from Images in the Wildcited by 180
- 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
- 2018Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated-recurrent unitscited by 98
- 2016Tagger: Deep Unsupervised Perceptual Groupingcited by 69
- 2019Disentangling neural mechanisms for perceptual groupingcited by 28
- 2016Deep Supervision with Shape Concepts for Occlusion-Aware 3D Object Parsingcited by 19
- 2018DeepFlux for Skeletons in the Wildcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2022A Review of Emerging Research Directions in Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 33
- 2024ARCLE: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus Learning Environment for Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2025ReasonVQA: A Multi-hop Reasoning Benchmark with Structural Knowledge for Visual Question Answeringcited by 7
- 2025Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard Problemscited by 7
- 2024A-I-RAVEN and I-RAVEN-Mesh: Two New Benchmarks for Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025GIFARC: Synthetic Dataset for Leveraging Human-Intuitive Analogies to Elevate AI Reasoningcited by 1
- 2025Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard Problems16 Aug 2025
- 2025ReasonVQA: A Multi-hop Reasoning Benchmark with Structural Knowledge for Visual Question Answering22 Jul 2025
- 2025GIFARC: Synthetic Dataset for Leveraging Human-Intuitive Analogies to Elevate AI Reasoning27 May 2025
- 2024ARCLE: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus Learning Environment for Reinforcement Learning30 Jul 2024
- 2024A-I-RAVEN and I-RAVEN-Mesh: Two New Benchmarks for Abstract Visual Reasoning16 Jun 2024
- 2022A Review of Emerging Research Directions in Abstract Visual Reasoning21 Feb 2022