mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attention Forcing for Machine Translation

arXiv 2104.01264 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auto-regressive sequence-to-sequence models with attention mechanisms have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various tasks including Text-To-Speech (TTS) and Neural Machine Translation (NMT). The standard training approach, teacher forcing, guides a model with the reference output history. At inference stage, the generated output history must be used. This mismatch can impact performance. However, it is highly challenging to train the model using the generated output. Several approaches have been proposed to address this problem, normally by selectively using the generated output history. To make training stable, these approaches often require a heuristic schedule or an auxiliary classifier. This paper introduces attention forcing for NMT. This approach guides the model with the generated output history and reference attention, and can reduce the training-inference mismatch without a schedule or a classifier. Attention forcing has been successful in TTS, but its application to NMT is more challenging, due to the discrete and multi-modal nature of the output space. To tackle this problem, this paper adds a selection scheme to vanilla attention forcing, which automatically selects a suitable training approach for each pair of training data. Experiments show that attention forcing can improve the overall translation quality and the diversity of the translations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2021.

Builds on

28 of 31 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  2. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  3. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
  4. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  5. 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
  6. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
  7. 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 710
  8. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  9. 2017Tacotron: Towards End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 487
  10. 2015Attention-Based Models for Speech Recognitioncited by 400
  11. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 375
  12. 2018Style Tokens: Unsupervised Style Modeling, Control and Transfer in End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 257
16 more
  1. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 214
  2. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
  3. 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 126
  4. 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
  5. 2019Mixture Models for Diverse Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 77
  6. 2020End-to-End Adversarial Text-to-Speechcited by 77
  7. 2018Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationalescited by 54
  8. 2019DurIAN: Duration Informed Attention Network For Multimodal Synthesiscited by 33
  9. 2016Neural Machine Translation with Supervised Attentioncited by 31
  10. 2017Neural Machine Translation and Sequence-to-sequence Models: A Tutorialcited by 25
  11. 2017Adversarial Neural Machine Translationcited by 21
  12. 2017Supervising Neural Attention Models for Video Captioning by Human Gaze Datacited by 18
  13. 2019Parallel Scheduled Samplingcited by 17
  14. 2019A New GAN-based End-to-End TTS Training Algorithmcited by 13
  15. 2019Teacher-Student Training for Robust Tacotron-based TTScited by 11
  16. 2019Attention Forcing for Sequence-to-sequence Model Trainingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.

3 papers.