mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Exploration of Data Augmentation Techniques for Improving English to Tigrinya Translation

arXiv 2103.16789 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2021cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has been shown that the performance of neural machine translation (NMT) drops starkly in low-resource conditions, often requiring large amounts of auxiliary data to achieve competitive results. An effective method of generating auxiliary data is back-translation of target language sentences. In this work, we present a case study of Tigrinya where we investigate several back-translation methods to generate synthetic source sentences. We find that in low-resource conditions, back-translation by pivoting through a higher-resource language related to the target language proves most effective resulting in substantial improvements over baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2021.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  5. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  7. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
  8. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  9. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  10. 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
  11. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  12. 2016Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 188
5 more
  1. 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
  2. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
  3. 2018Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 138
  4. 2019Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 61
  5. 2019compare-mt: A Tool for Holistic Comparison of Language Generation Systemscited by 43

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

6 papers.