mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minimum complexity interpolation in random features models

arXiv 2103.15996 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2021cs.LG math.ST stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their many appealing properties, kernel methods are heavily affected by the curse of dimensionality. For instance, in the case of inner product kernels in ℝd, the Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) norm is often very large for functions that depend strongly on a small subset of directions (ridge functions). Correspondingly, such functions are difficult to learn using kernel methods. This observation has motivated the study of generalizations of kernel methods, whereby the RKHS norm -- which is equivalent to a weighted ℓ2 norm -- is replaced by a weighted functional ℓp norm, which we refer to as Fp norm. Unfortunately, tractability of these approaches is unclear. The kernel trick is not available and minimizing these norms requires to solve an infinite-dimensional convex problem. We study random features approximations to these norms and show that, for p>1, the number of random features required to approximate the original learning problem is upper bounded by a polynomial in the sample size. Hence, learning with Fp norms is tractable in these cases. We introduce a proof technique based on uniform concentration in the dual, which can be of broader interest in the study of overparametrized models. For p= 1, our guarantees for the random features approximation break down. We prove instead that learning with the F1 norm is mathsfNP-hard under a randomized reduction based on the problem of learning halfspaces with noise.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2021.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  3. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  4. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  5. 2014Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networkscited by 329
  6. 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 260
  7. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 259
  8. 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
  9. 2019Towards moderate overparameterization: global convergence guarantees for training shallow neural networkscited by 176
  10. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  11. 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
  12. 2020When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?cited by 150
9 more
  1. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
  2. 2021Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentrationcited by 110
  3. 2019On the Power and Limitations of Random Features for Understanding Neural Networkscited by 103
  4. 2020Towards a Mathematical Understanding of Neural Network-Based Machine Learning: what we know and what we don'tcited by 94
  5. 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
  6. 2020A Precise High-Dimensional Asymptotic Theory for Boosting and Minimum-ℓ1-Norm Interpolated Classifierscited by 44
  7. 2017Geometry of Optimization and Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 39
  8. 2017Efficient Convex Optimization with Membership Oraclescited by 23
  9. 2019On the Multiple Descent of Minimum-Norm Interpolants and Restricted Lower Isometry of Kernelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.