Zero-shot Sequence Labeling for Transformer-based Sentence Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate how sentence-level transformers can be modified into effective sequence labelers at the token level without any direct supervision. Existing approaches to zero-shot sequence labeling do not perform well when applied on transformer-based architectures. As transformers contain multiple layers of multi-head self-attention, information in the sentence gets distributed between many tokens, negatively affecting zero-shot token-level performance. We find that a soft attention module which explicitly encourages sharpness of attention weights can significantly outperform existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2021.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
- 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 254
8 more
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 158
- 2017The Promise and Peril of Human Evaluation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 52
- 2019Generating Token-Level Explanations for Natural Language Inferencecited by 28
- 2018Neural Network Models for Paraphrase Identification, Semantic Textual Similarity, Natural Language Inference, and Question Answeringcited by 23
- 2016Compositional Sequence Labeling Models for Error Detection in Learner Writingcited by 16
- 2019Context is Key: Grammatical Error Detection with Contextual Word Representationscited by 14
- 2018Zero-shot Sequence Labeling: Transferring Knowledge from Sentences to Tokenscited by 12
- 2018Jointly Learning to Label Sentences and Tokenscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
- 2021Translation Error Detection as Rationale Extractioncited by 22
- 2022Logical Reasoning with Span-Level Predictions for Interpretable and Robust NLI Modelscited by 17
- 2023Atomic Inference for NLI with Generated Facts as Atomscited by 16
- 2023Finding the Needle in a Haystack: Unsupervised Rationale Extraction from Long Text Classifierscited by 1
- 2023Atomic Inference for NLI with Generated Facts as Atoms22 May 2023
- 2023Finding the Needle in a Haystack: Unsupervised Rationale Extraction from Long Text Classifiers14 Mar 2023
- 2022Logical Reasoning with Span-Level Predictions for Interpretable and Robust NLI Models23 May 2022
- 2021Translation Error Detection as Rationale Extraction27 Aug 2021
- 2021Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inference16 Apr 2021