mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Inference Tree Search in Large POMDPs

arXiv 2103.13860 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2021cs.AI math.PR q-bio.NCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to plan ahead efficiently is key for both living organisms and artificial systems. Model-based planning and prospection are widely studied in cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI), but from different perspectives--and with different desiderata in mind (biological realism versus scalability) that are difficult to reconcile. Here, we introduce a novel method to plan in POMDPs--Active Inference Tree Search (AcT)--that combines the normative character and biological realism of a leading planning theory in neuroscience (Active Inference) and the scalability of tree search methods in AI. This unification enhances both approaches. On the one hand, tree searches enable the biologically grounded, first principle method of active inference to be applied to large-scale problems. On the other hand, active inference provides a principled solution to the exploration-exploitation dilemma, which is often addressed heuristically in tree search methods. Our simulations show that AcT successfully navigates binary trees that are challenging for sampling-based methods, problems that require adaptive exploration, and the large POMDP problem 'RockSample'--in which AcT reproduces state-of-the-art POMDP solutions. Furthermore, we illustrate how AcT can be used to simulate neurophysiological responses (e.g., in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex) of humans and other animals that solve large planning problems. These numerical analyses show that Active Tree Search is a principled realisation of neuroscientific and AI planning theories, which offer both biological realism and scalability.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2021.

Builds on

20 of 117 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 466
  2. 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 248
  3. 2019Self-Driving Cars: A Surveycited by 147
  4. 2018Deep Variational Reinforcement Learning for POMDPscited by 122
  5. 2016DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularizationcited by 105
  6. 2020Deep active inference agents using Monte-Carlo methodscited by 72
  7. 2014Algorithms for multi-armed bandit problemscited by 63
  8. 2020Sophisticated Inferencecited by 56
  9. 2019Deep Active Inference as Variational Policy Gradientscited by 52
  10. 2017QMDP-Net: Deep Learning for Planning under Partial Observabilitycited by 51
  11. 2020Reinforcement Learning through Active Inferencecited by 47
  12. 2017Deep Active Inferencecited by 44
8 more
  1. 2014Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPscited by 42
  2. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning and its Neuroscientific Implicationscited by 33
  3. 2019Scaling active inferencecited by 30
  4. 2014Bandit Algorithms for Tree Searchcited by 25
  5. 2018HyP-DESPOT: A Hybrid Parallel Algorithm for Online Planning under Uncertaintycited by 18
  6. 2018Model-free, Model-based, and General Intelligencecited by 14
  7. 2019Deep Learning for Cognitive Neurosciencecited by 7
  8. 2013Approximate Planning for Factored POMDPs using Belief State Simplificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.