Optimising the selection of samples for robust lidar camera calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a robust calibration pipeline that optimises the selection of calibration samples for the estimation of calibration parameters that fit the entire scene. We minimise user error by automating the data selection process according to a metric, called Variability of Quality (VOQ) that gives a score to each calibration set of samples. We show that this VOQ score is correlated with the estimated calibration parameter's ability to generalise well to the entire scene, thereby overcoming the overfitting problems of existing calibration algorithms. Our approach has the benefits of simplifying the calibration process for practitioners of any calibration expertise level and providing an objective measure of the quality for our calibration pipeline's input and output data. We additionally use a novel method of assessing the accuracy of the calibration parameters. It involves computing reprojection errors for the entire scene to ensure that the parameters are well fitted to all features in the scene. Our proposed calibration pipeline takes 90s, and obtains an average reprojection error of 1-1.2cm, with standard deviation of 0.4-0.5cm over 46 poses evenly distributed in a scene. This process has been validated by experimentation on a high resolution, software definable lidar, Baraja Spectrum-Scan; and a low, fixed resolution lidar, Velodyne VLP-16. We have shown that despite the vast differences in lidar technologies, our proposed approach manages to estimate robust calibration parameters for both. Our code and data set used for this paper are made available as open-source.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2021.
Builds on
5 of 24 references.
References · 5
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2019Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 124
- 2017LiDAR-Camera Calibration using 3D-3D Point correspondencescited by 18
- 2019Automatic extrinsic calibration between a camera and a 3D Lidar using 3D point and plane correspondencescited by 15
- 2019Improvements to Target-Based 3D LiDAR to Camera Calibrationcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Towards Robust Robot 3D Perception in Urban Environments: The UT Campus Object Datasetcited by 28
- 2021See Eye to Eye: A Lidar-Agnostic 3D Detection Framework for Unsupervised Multi-Target Domain Adaptationcited by 15
- 2024Online,Target-Free LiDAR-Camera Extrinsic Calibration via Cross-Modal Mask Matchingcited by 12
- 2022Viewer-Centred Surface Completion for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in 3D Object Detectioncited by 10
- 2023Multimodal Dataset for Localization, Mapping and Crop Monitoring in Citrus Tree Farmscited by 6
- 2025Environment-Driven Online LiDAR-Camera Extrinsic Calibrationcited by 3
- 2024VIRUS-NeRF -- Vision, InfraRed and UltraSonic based Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1
- 2025M2S-RoAD: Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation for Road Damage Using Camera and LiDAR Datacited by 1
- 2026An Annotation-to-Detection Framework for Autonomous and Robust Vine Trunk Localization in the Field by Mobile Agricultural Robotscited by 0
- 2026An Annotation-to-Detection Framework for Autonomous and Robust Vine Trunk Localization in the Field by Mobile Agricultural Robots20 Mar 2026
- 2025M2S-RoAD: Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation for Road Damage Using Camera and LiDAR Data14 Apr 2025
- 2025Environment-Driven Online LiDAR-Camera Extrinsic Calibration2 Feb 2025
- 2024Online,Target-Free LiDAR-Camera Extrinsic Calibration via Cross-Modal Mask Matching28 Apr 2024
- 2024VIRUS-NeRF -- Vision, InfraRed and UltraSonic based Neural Radiance Fields14 Mar 2024
- 2023Multimodal Dataset for Localization, Mapping and Crop Monitoring in Citrus Tree Farms27 Sep 2023
- 2023Towards Robust Robot 3D Perception in Urban Environments: The UT Campus Object Dataset24 Sep 2023
- 2022Viewer-Centred Surface Completion for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in 3D Object Detection14 Sep 2022
- 2021See Eye to Eye: A Lidar-Agnostic 3D Detection Framework for Unsupervised Multi-Target Domain Adaptation17 Nov 2021