mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Subsampling of Realistic Images From GANs Conditional on a Class or a Continuous Variable

arXiv 2103.11166 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2021cs.CV cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, subsampling or refining images generated from unconditional GANs has been actively studied to improve the overall image quality. Unfortunately, these methods are often observed less effective or inefficient in handling conditional GANs (cGANs) -- conditioning on a class (aka class-conditional GANs) or a continuous variable (aka continuous cGANs or CcGANs). In this work, we introduce an effective and efficient subsampling scheme, named conditional density ratio-guided rejection sampling (cDR-RS), to sample high-quality images from cGANs. Specifically, we first develop a novel conditional density ratio estimation method, termed cDRE-F-cSP, by proposing the conditional Softplus (cSP) loss and an improved feature extraction mechanism. We then derive the error bound of a density ratio model trained with the cSP loss. Finally, we accept or reject a fake image in terms of its estimated conditional density ratio. A filtering scheme is also developed to increase fake images' label consistency without losing diversity when sampling from CcGANs. We extensively test the effectiveness and efficiency of cDR-RS in sampling from both class-conditional GANs and CcGANs on five benchmark datasets. When sampling from class-conditional GANs, cDR-RS outperforms modern state-of-the-art methods by a large margin (except DRE-F-SP+RS) in terms of effectiveness. Although the effectiveness of cDR-RS is often comparable to that of DRE-F-SP+RS, cDR-RS is substantially more efficient. When sampling from CcGANs, the superiority of cDR-RS is even more noticeable in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. Notably, with the consumption of reasonable computational resources, cDR-RS can substantially reduce Label Score without decreasing the diversity of CcGAN-generated images, while other methods often need to trade much diversity for slightly improved Label Score.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2021.

Builds on

30 of 56 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  5. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  6. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  7. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  8. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  9. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  10. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  11. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  12. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
18 more
  1. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  2. 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 562
  3. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
  4. 2020Differentiable Augmentation for Data-Efficient GAN Trainingcited by 361
  5. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 253
  6. 2017MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Networkcited by 251
  7. 2020A Review on Generative Adversarial Networks: Algorithms, Theory, and Applicationscited by 209
  8. 2017GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibriumcited by 208
  9. 2017HashNet: Deep Learning to Hash by Continuationcited by 121
  10. 2020Your GAN is Secretly an Energy-based Model and You Should use Discriminator Driven Latent Samplingcited by 71
  11. 2018Discriminator Rejection Samplingcited by 48
  12. 2018SMIT: Stochastic Multi-Label Image-to-Image Translationcited by 21
  13. 2019On the Evaluation of Conditional GANscited by 20
  14. 2020Continuous Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks: Novel Empirical Losses and Label Input Mechanismscited by 19
  15. 2019Subsampling Generative Adversarial Networks: Density Ratio Estimation in Feature Space with Softplus Losscited by 11
  16. 2019Mining GOLD Samples for Conditional GANscited by 11
  17. 2019Collaborative Sampling in Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 7
  18. 2020Conditional Image Generation with One-Vs-All Classifiercited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.