mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness-aware Outlier Ensemble

arXiv 2103.09419 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Outlier ensemble methods have shown outstanding performance on the discovery of instances that are significantly different from the majority of the data. However, without the awareness of fairness, their applicability in the ethical scenarios, such as fraud detection and judiciary judgement system, could be degraded. In this paper, we propose to reduce the bias of the outlier ensemble results through a fairness-aware ensemble framework. Due to the lack of ground truth in the outlier detection task, the key challenge is how to mitigate the degradation in the detection performance with the improvement of fairness. To address this challenge, we define a distance measure based on the output of conventional outlier ensemble techniques to estimate the possible cost associated with detection performance degradation. Meanwhile, we propose a post-processing framework to tune the original ensemble results through a stacking process so that we can achieve a trade off between fairness and detection performance. Detection performance is measured by the area under ROC curve (AUC) while fairness is measured at both group and individual level. Experiments on eight public datasets are conducted. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in improving fairness of outlier ensemble results. We also analyze the trade-off between AUC and fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2021.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  6. 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
  7. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  8. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  9. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  10. 2018Invariant Representations without Adversarial Trainingcited by 111
  11. 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
  12. 2019Proportionally Fair Clusteringcited by 69
2 more
  1. 2018iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 64
  2. 2020Fair Outlier Detectioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.