Exploring the Assessment List for Trustworthy AI in the Context of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in critical applications. Thus, the need for dependable AI systems is rapidly growing. In 2018, the European Commission appointed experts to a High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI-HLEG). AI-HLEG defined Trustworthy AI as 1) lawful, 2) ethical, and 3) robust and specified seven corresponding key requirements. To help development organizations, AI-HLEG recently published the Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI). We present an illustrative case study from applying ALTAI to an ongoing development project of an Advanced Driver-Assistance System (ADAS) that relies on Machine Learning (ML). Our experience shows that ALTAI is largely applicable to ADAS development, but specific parts related to human agency and transparency can be disregarded. Moreover, bigger questions related to societal and environmental impact cannot be tackled by an ADAS supplier in isolation. We present how we plan to develop the ADAS to ensure ALTAI-compliance. Finally, we provide three recommendations for the next revision of ALTAI, i.e., life-cycle variants, domain-specific adaptations, and removed redundancy.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2021.
Builds on
5 of 18 references.
References · 5
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2019DeepPrivacy: A Generative Adversarial Network for Face Anonymizationcited by 108
- 2019Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: Perspectives from Data Scientistscited by 49
- 2018Safely Entering the Deep: A Review of Verification and Validation for Machine Learning and a Challenge Elicitation in the Automotive Industrycited by 38
- 2019Sharing of vulnerability information among companies -- a survey of Swedish companiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
- 2022Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: A Review and Reflectioncited by 7
- 2022Machine Learning Testing in an ADAS Case Study Using Simulation-Integrated Bio-Inspired Search-Based Testingcited by 4
- 2022Exploring ML testing in practice -- Lessons learned from an interactive rapid review with Axis Communicationscited by 3
- 2022AI Ethics in Smart Healthcarecited by 0
- 2025E-LENS: User Requirements-Oriented AI Ethics Assurancecited by 0
- 2025E-LENS: User Requirements-Oriented AI Ethics Assurance6 Feb 2025
- 2022AI Ethics in Smart Healthcare2 Nov 2022
- 2022Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: A Review and Reflection3 Oct 2022
- 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake System16 Apr 2022
- 2022Exploring ML testing in practice -- Lessons learned from an interactive rapid review with Axis Communications30 Mar 2022
- 2022Machine Learning Testing in an ADAS Case Study Using Simulation-Integrated Bio-Inspired Search-Based Testing22 Mar 2022