mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Constant Random Perturbations Provide Adversarial Robustness with Minimal Effect on Accuracy

arXiv 2103.08265 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes an attack-independent (non-adversarial training) technique for improving adversarial robustness of neural network models, with minimal loss of standard accuracy. We suggest creating a neighborhood around each training example, such that the label is kept constant for all inputs within that neighborhood. Unlike previous work that follows a similar principle, we apply this idea by extending the training set with multiple perturbations for each training example, drawn from within the neighborhood. These perturbations are model independent, and remain constant throughout the entire training process. We analyzed our method empirically on MNIST, SVHN, and CIFAR-10, under different attacks and conditions. Results suggest that the proposed approach improves standard accuracy over other defenses while having increased robustness compared to vanilla adversarial training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2021.

Builds on

27 of 32 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  8. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  9. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  10. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  12. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
15 more
  1. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
  2. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
  3. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  4. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  5. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
  6. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  7. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
  8. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
  9. 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 264
  10. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  12. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  13. 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 76
  14. 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
  15. 2019Defending against Whitebox Adversarial Attacks via Randomized Discretizationcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.