mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparing Popular Simulation Environments in the Scope of Robotics and Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2103.04616 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2021cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This letter compares the performance of four different, popular simulation environments for robotics and reinforcement learning (RL) through a series of benchmarks. The benchmarked scenarios are designed carefully with current industrial applications in mind. Given the need to run simulations as fast as possible to reduce the real-world training time of the RL agents, the comparison includes not only different simulation environments but also different hardware configurations, ranging from an entry-level notebook up to a dual CPU high performance server. We show that the chosen simulation environments benefit the most from single core performance. Yet, using a multi core system, multiple simulations could be run in parallel to increase the performance.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2021.

Builds on

8 of 35 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  2. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  3. 2016Learning to Perform Physics Experiments via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
  4. 2019Assistive Gym: A Physics Simulation Framework for Assistive Roboticscited by 44
  5. 2019Gym-Ignition: Reproducible Robotic Simulations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  6. 2020A Comparison of Humanoid Robot Simulators: A Quantitative Approachcited by 8
  7. 2014Tools for dynamics simulation of robots: a survey based on user feedbackcited by 3
  8. 2019Marathon Environments: Multi-Agent Continuous Control Benchmarks in a Modern Video Game Enginecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.