mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Robustness of Deep Learning Classifiers Using Two-Factor Perturbation

arXiv 2103.03102 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper adds to the fundamental body of work on benchmarking the robustness of deep learning (DL) classifiers. We innovate a new benchmarking methodology to evaluate robustness of DL classifiers. Also, we introduce a new four-quadrant statistical visualization tool, including minimum accuracy, maximum accuracy, mean accuracy, and coefficient of variation, for benchmarking robustness of DL classifiers. To measure robust DL classifiers, we created a comprehensive 69 benchmarking image set, including a clean set, sets with single factor perturbations, and sets with two-factor perturbation conditions. After collecting experimental results, we first report that using two-factor perturbed images improves both robustness and accuracy of DL classifiers. The two-factor perturbation includes (1) two digital perturbations (salt & pepper noise and Gaussian noise) applied in both sequences, and (2) one digital perturbation (salt & pepper noise) and a geometric perturbation (rotation) applied in both sequences. All source codes, related image sets, and preliminary data, figures are shared on a GitHub website to support future academic research and industry projects. The web resources locate at https://github.com/caperock/robustai

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

15 of 34 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  3. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  4. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  5. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
  6. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  7. 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
  8. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 119
  9. 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 108
  10. 2018Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Surface Variationscited by 99
  11. 2016Examining the Impact of Blur on Recognition by Convolutional Networkscited by 58
  12. 2017Google's Cloud Vision API Is Not Robust To Noisecited by 37
3 more
  1. 2017Comparing deep neural networks against humans: object recognition when the signal gets weakercited by 34
  2. 2017Quality Resilient Deep Neural Networkscited by 12
  3. 2018Improving Data Quality through Deep Learning and Statistical Modelscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

3 papers.