mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sibyl: Understanding and Addressing the Usability Challenges of Machine Learning In High-Stakes Decision Making

arXiv 2103.02071 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.HC cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) is being applied to a diverse and ever-growing set of domains. In many cases, domain experts - who often have no expertise in ML or data science - are asked to use ML predictions to make high-stakes decisions. Multiple ML usability challenges can appear as result, such as lack of user trust in the model, inability to reconcile human-ML disagreement, and ethical concerns about oversimplification of complex problems to a single algorithm output. In this paper, we investigate the ML usability challenges that present in the domain of child welfare screening through a series of collaborations with child welfare screeners. Following the iterative design process between the ML scientists, visualization researchers, and domain experts (child screeners), we first identified four key ML challenges and honed in on one promising explainable ML technique to address them (local factor contributions). Then we implemented and evaluated our visual analytics tool, Sibyl, to increase the interpretability and interactivity of local factor contributions. The effectiveness of our tool is demonstrated by two formal user studies with 12 non-expert participants and 13 expert participants respectively. Valuable feedback was collected, from which we composed a list of design implications as a useful guideline for researchers who aim to develop an interpretable and interactive visualization tool for ML prediction models deployed for child welfare screeners and other similar domain experts.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

9 of 35 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  4. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  5. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  6. 2019explAIner: A Visual Analytics Framework for Interactive and Explainable Machine Learningcited by 69
  7. 2018RetainVis: Visual Analytics with Interpretable and Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 61
  8. 2017ActiVis: Visual Exploration of Industry-Scale Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 56
  9. 2018Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Modelscited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Improving Human-AI Partnerships in Child Welfare: Understanding Worker Practices, Challenges, and Desires for Algorithmic Decision Supportcited by 37
  2. 2023Visual Analytics For Machine Learning: A Data Perspective Surveycited by 25
  3. 2024On Behalf of the Stakeholders: Trends in NLP Model Interpretability in the Era of LLMscited by 24
  4. 2024LLMs for XAI: Future Directions for Explaining Explanationscited by 19
  5. 2023Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic reviewcited by 18
  6. 2023Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Frameworkcited by 11
  7. 2023Towards an Understanding and Explanation for Mixed-Initiative Artificial Scientific Text Detectioncited by 8
  8. 2024Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Usecited by 6
  9. 2025Tempo: Helping Data Scientists and Domain Experts Collaboratively Specify Predictive Modeling Taskscited by 6
  10. 2022Are Metrics Enough? Guidelines for Communicating and Visualizing Predictive Models to Subject Matter Expertscited by 4
  11. 2022The Need for Interpretable Features: Motivation and Taxonomycited by 3
  12. 2023Explain To Decide: A Human-Centric Review on the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in AI-assisted Decision Makingcited by 2
7 more
  1. 2022Machine Learning in Transaction Monitoring: The Prospect of xAIcited by 1
  2. 2023Lessons from Usable ML Deployments and Application to Wind Turbine Monitoringcited by 0
  3. 2023Pyreal: A Framework for Interpretable ML Explanationscited by 0
  4. 2024Underspecified Human Decision Experiments Considered Harmfulcited by 0
  5. 2025Explanation User Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 0
  6. 2025Restricted Receptive Fields for Face Verificationcited by 0
  7. 2026Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisionscited by 0