Graph Information Vanishing Phenomenon inImplicit Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the key problems of GNNs is how to describe the importance of neighbor nodes in the aggregation process for learning node representations. A class of GNNs solves this problem by learning implicit weights to represent the importance of neighbor nodes, which we call implicit GNNs such as Graph Attention Network. The basic idea of implicit GNNs is to introduce graph information with special properties followed by Learnable Transformation Structures (LTS) which encode the importance of neighbor nodes via a data-driven way. In this paper, we argue that LTS makes the special properties of graph information disappear during the learning process, resulting in graph information unhelpful for learning node representations. We call this phenomenon Graph Information Vanishing (GIV). Also, we find that LTS maps different graph information into highly similar results. To validate the above two points, we design two sets of 70 random experiments on five Implicit GNNs methods and seven benchmark datasets by using a random permutation operator to randomly disrupt the order of graph information and replacing graph information with random values. We find that randomization does not affect the model performance in 93% of the cases, with about 7 percentage causing an average 0.5% accuracy loss. And the cosine similarity of output results, generated by LTS mapping different graph information, over 99% with an 81% proportion. The experimental results provide evidence to support the existence of GIV in Implicit GNNs and imply that the existing methods of Implicit GNNs do not make good use of graph information. The relationship between graph information and LTS should be rethought to ensure that graph information is used in node representation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.
Builds on
20 of 27 references.
References · 20
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
- 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,097
8 more
- 2015Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprintscited by 751
- 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
- 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 400
- 2018Session-based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 312
- 2015Deep Convolutional Networks on Graph-Structured Datacited by 246
- 2019Understanding Attention and Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
- 2018Attention-based Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 100
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2021Curvature Graph Neural Networkcited by 24
- 2023CAT: A Causally Graph Attention Network for Trimming Heterophilic Graphcited by 2
- 2023CAT: A Causally Graph Attention Network for Trimming Heterophilic Graph14 Dec 2023
- 2021Curvature Graph Neural Network30 Jun 2021