mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PA-ResSeg: A Phase Attention Residual Network for Liver Tumor Segmentation from Multi-phase CT Images

arXiv 2103.00274 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a phase attention residual network (PA-ResSeg) to model multi-phase features for accurate liver tumor segmentation, in which a phase attention (PA) is newly proposed to additionally exploit the images of arterial (ART) phase to facilitate the segmentation of portal venous (PV) phase. The PA block consists of an intra-phase attention (Intra-PA) module and an inter-phase attention (Inter-PA) module to capture channel-wise self-dependencies and cross-phase interdependencies, respectively. Thus it enables the network to learn more representative multi-phase features by refining the PV features according to the channel dependencies and recalibrating the ART features based on the learned interdependencies between phases. We propose a PA-based multi-scale fusion (MSF) architecture to embed the PA blocks in the network at multiple levels along the encoding path to fuse multi-scale features from multi-phase images. Moreover, a 3D boundary-enhanced loss (BE-loss) is proposed for training to make the network more sensitive to boundaries. To evaluate the performance of our proposed PA-ResSeg, we conducted experiments on a multi-phase CT dataset of focal liver lesions (MPCT-FLLs). Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed method by achieving a dice per case (DPC) of 0.77.87, a dice global (DG) of 0.8682, a volumetric overlap error (VOE) of 0.3328 and a relative volume difference (RVD) of 0.0443 on the MPCT-FLLs. Furthermore, to validate the effectiveness and robustness of PA-ResSeg, we conducted extra experiments on another multi-phase liver tumor dataset and obtained a DPC of 0.8290, a DG of 0.9132, a VOE of 0.2637 and a RVD of 0.0163. The proposed method shows its robustness and generalization capability in different datasets and different backbones.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2021.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  5. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,001
  6. 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 504
  7. 2020UNet 3+: A Full-Scale Connected UNet for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 331
  8. 2017Interactive Medical Image Segmentation using Deep Learning with Image-specific Fine-tuningcited by 110
  9. 2016Automatic Liver and Lesion Segmentation in CT Using Cascaded Fully Convolutional Neural Networks and 3D Conditional Random Fieldscited by 43
  10. 2017A deep learning model integrating FCNNs and CRFs for brain tumor segmentationcited by 35
  11. 2020Volumetric Attention for 3D Medical Image Segmentation and Detectioncited by 29
  12. 2017Automatic Liver and Tumor Segmentation of CT and MRI Volumes using Cascaded Fully Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 28
2 more
  1. 2019Modified U-Net (mU-Net) with Incorporation of Object-Dependent High Level Features for Improved Liver and Liver-Tumor Segmentation in CT Imagescited by 28
  2. 2016Adaptive Local Window for Level Set Segmentation of CT and MRI Liver Lesionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

7 papers.