mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Word frequency-rank relationship in tagged texts

arXiv 2102.10992 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze the frequency-rank relationship in sub-vocabularies corresponding to three different grammatical classes (nouns, verbs, and others) in a collection of literary works in English, whose words have been automatically tagged according to their grammatical role. Comparing with a null hypothesis which assumes that words belonging to each class are uniformly distributed across the frequency-ranked vocabulary of the whole work, we disclose statistically significant differences between the three classes. This results point to the fact that frequency-rank relationships may reflect linguistic features associated with grammatical function.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2021.

Builds on

5 of 18 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Language Model is All You Need: Natural Language Understanding as Question Answeringcited by 29
  2. 2020Heaps' law and Heaps functions in tagged texts: Evidences of their linguistic relevancecited by 8
  3. 2020Supervised Seeded Iterated Learning for Interactive Language Learningcited by 7
  4. 2020Words ranking and Hirsch index for identifying the core of the hapaxes in political textscited by 2
  5. 2019A joint text mining-rank size investigation of the rhetoric structures of the US Presidents' speechescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.