mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding and Enhancing the Use of Context for Machine Translation

arXiv 2102.10437 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To understand and infer meaning in language, neural models have to learn complicated nuances. Discovering distinctive linguistic phenomena from data is not an easy task. For instance, lexical ambiguity is a fundamental feature of language which is challenging to learn. Even more prominently, inferring the meaning of rare and unseen lexical units is difficult with neural networks. Meaning is often determined from context. With context, languages allow meaning to be conveyed even when the specific words used are not known by the reader. To model this learning process, a system has to learn from a few instances in context and be able to generalize well to unseen cases. The learning process is hindered when training data is scarce for a task. Even with sufficient data, learning patterns for the long tail of the lexical distribution is challenging. In this thesis, we focus on understanding certain potentials of contexts in neural models and design augmentation models to benefit from them. We focus on machine translation as an important instance of the more general language understanding problem. To translate from a source language to a target language, a neural model has to understand the meaning of constituents in the provided context and generate constituents with the same meanings in the target language. This task accentuates the value of capturing nuances of language and the necessity of generalization from few observations. The main problem we study in this thesis is what neural machine translation models learn from data and how we can devise more focused contexts to enhance this learning. Looking more in-depth into the role of context and the impact of data on learning models is essential to advance the NLP field. Moreover, it helps highlight the vulnerabilities of current neural networks and provides insights into designing more robust models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 248 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2021.

Builds on

32 of 248 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  7. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  8. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  9. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  10. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
  11. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  12. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
20 more
  1. 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 573
  2. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  3. 2014Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional Netscited by 122
  4. 2019Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understandingcited by 111
  5. 2018Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classificationcited by 96
  6. 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
  7. 2019Measuring Compositionality in Representation Learningcited by 84
  8. 2019TANDA: Transfer and Adapt Pre-Trained Transformer Models for Answer Sentence Selectioncited by 74
  9. 2018Universal Neural Machine Translation for Extremely Low Resource Languagescited by 66
  10. 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
  11. 2016Problems With Evaluation of Word Embeddings Using Word Similarity Taskscited by 25
  12. 2017Generalization without systematicity: On the compositional skills of sequence-to-sequence recurrent networkscited by 18
  13. 2019A Fully Differentiable Beam Search Decodercited by 14
  14. 2017Neural machine translation for low-resource languagescited by 8
  15. 2019Adaptation of Machine Translation Models with Back-translated Data using Transductive Data Selection Methodscited by 8
  16. 2018Imparting Interpretability to Word Embeddings while Preserving Semantic Structurecited by 6
  17. 2019Combining SMT and NMT Back-Translated Data for Efficient NMTcited by 4
  18. 2019How Can BERT Help Lexical Semantics Tasks?cited by 1
  19. 2020Detecting and Understanding Generalization Barriers for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1
  20. 2020Enhanced back-translation for low resource neural machine translation using self-trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.