Proactive DP: A Multple Target Optimization Framework for DP-SGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a multiple target optimization framework for DP-SGD referred to as pro-active DP. In contrast to traditional DP accountants, which are used to track the expenditure of privacy budgets, the pro-active DP scheme allows one to a-priori select parameters of DP-SGD based on a fixed privacy budget (in terms of ε and δ) in such a way to optimize the anticipated utility (test accuracy) the most. To achieve this objective, we first propose significant improvements to the moment account method, presenting a closed-form (ε,δ)-DP guarantee that connects all parameters in the DP-SGD setup. We show that DP-SGD is (ε<0.5,δ=1/N)-DP if σ=√2(ε +ln(1/δ))/ε with T at least ≈ 2k2/ε and (2/e)2k2-1/2≥ ln(N), where T is the total number of rounds, and K=kN is the total number of gradient computations where k measures K in number of epochs of size N of the local data set. We prove that our expression is close to tight in that if T is more than a constant factor ≈ 4 smaller than the lower bound ≈ 2k2/ε, then the (ε,δ)-DP guarantee is violated. The above DP guarantee can be enhanced in thatDP-SGD is (ε, δ)-DP if σ = √2(ε+ln(1/δ))/ε with T at least ≈ 2k2/ε together with two additional, less intuitive, conditions that allow larger ε≥ 0.5. Our DP theory allows us to create a utility graph and DP calculator. These tools link privacy and utility objectives and search for optimal experiment setups, efficiently taking into account both accuracy and privacy objectives, as well as implementation goals. We furnish a comprehensive implementation flow of our proactive DP, with rigorous experiments to showcase the proof-of-concept.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.
Builds on
19 of 46 references.
References · 19
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 266
- 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 208
- 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 171
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2018SGD and Hogwild! Convergence Without the Bounded Gradients Assumptioncited by 94
7 more
- 2019Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep Learningcited by 69
- 2020Global Convergence of Deep Networks with One Wide Layer Followed by Pyramidal Topologycited by 66
- 2019On Connected Sublevel Sets in Deep Learningcited by 51
- 2015Taming the Wild: A Unified Analysis of Hogwild!-Style Algorithmscited by 31
- 2018Improved asynchronous parallel optimization analysis for stochastic incremental methodscited by 30
- 2013Local Privacy, Data Processing Inequalities, and Statistical Minimax Ratescited by 26
- 2020Hogwild! over Distributed Local Data Sets with Linearly Increasing Mini-Batch Sizescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.