mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparsely Factored Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2102.08934 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard approach to incorporate linguistic information to neural machine translation systems consists in maintaining separate vocabularies for each of the annotated features to be incorporated (e.g. POS tags, dependency relation label), embed them, and then aggregate them with each subword in the word they belong to. This approach, however, cannot easily accommodate annotation schemes that are not dense for every word. We propose a method suited for such a case, showing large improvements in out-of-domain data, and comparable quality for the in-domain data. Experiments are performed in morphologically-rich languages like Basque and German, for the case of low-resource scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.

Builds on

7 of 22 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  5. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  6. 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
  7. 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38

Built on by

Not cited yet.