CheXternal: Generalization of Deep Learning Models for Chest X-ray Interpretation to Photos of Chest X-rays and External Clinical Settings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in training deep learning models have demonstrated the potential to provide accurate chest X-ray interpretation and increase access to radiology expertise. However, poor generalization due to data distribution shifts in clinical settings is a key barrier to implementation. In this study, we measured the diagnostic performance for 8 different chest X-ray models when applied to (1) smartphone photos of chest X-rays and (2) external datasets without any finetuning. All models were developed by different groups and submitted to the CheXpert challenge, and re-applied to test datasets without further tuning. We found that (1) on photos of chest X-rays, all 8 models experienced a statistically significant drop in task performance, but only 3 performed significantly worse than radiologists on average, and (2) on the external set, none of the models performed statistically significantly worse than radiologists, and five models performed statistically significantly better than radiologists. Our results demonstrate that some chest X-ray models, under clinically relevant distribution shifts, were comparable to radiologists while other models were not. Future work should investigate aspects of model training procedures and dataset collection that influence generalization in the presence of data distribution shifts.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.
Builds on
9 of 35 references.
References · 9
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 108
- 2020CheXpedition: Investigating Generalization Challenges for Translation of Chest X-Ray Algorithms to the Clinical Settingcited by 18
- 2020CheXphoto: 10,000+ Photos and Transformations of Chest X-rays for Benchmarking Deep Learning Robustnesscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Knowledge-enhanced Visual-Language Pre-training on Chest Radiology Imagescited by 128
- 2024CARZero: Cross-Attention Alignment for Radiology Zero-Shot Classificationcited by 40
- 2024Human Expertise in Algorithmic Predictioncited by 13
- 2022Image Projective Transformation Rectification with Synthetic Data for Smartphone-captured Chest X-ray Photos Classificationcited by 2
- 2026STAMP: Predicting Out-of-Distribution Generalization without Target Datacited by 0
- 2026STAMP: Predicting Out-of-Distribution Generalization without Target Data26 Sep 2026
- 2024CARZero: Cross-Attention Alignment for Radiology Zero-Shot Classification27 Feb 2024
- 2024Human Expertise in Algorithmic Prediction1 Feb 2024
- 2023Knowledge-enhanced Visual-Language Pre-training on Chest Radiology Images27 Feb 2023
- 2022Image Projective Transformation Rectification with Synthetic Data for Smartphone-captured Chest X-ray Photos Classification12 Oct 2022