Efficient Scheduling of Data Augmentation for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In deep reinforcement learning (RL), data augmentation is widely considered as a tool to induce a set of useful priors about semantic consistency and improve sample efficiency and generalization performance. However, even when the prior is useful for generalization, distilling it to RL agent often interferes with RL training and degenerates sample efficiency. Meanwhile, the agent is forgetful of the prior due to the non-stationary nature of RL. These observations suggest two extreme schedules of distillation: (i) over the entire training; or (ii) only at the end. Hence, we devise a stand-alone network distillation method to inject the consistency prior at any time (even after RL), and a simple yet efficient framework to automatically schedule the distillation. Specifically, the proposed framework first focuses on mastering train environments regardless of generalization by adaptively deciding which it or no augmentation to be used for the training. After this, we add the distillation to extract the remaining benefits for generalization from all the augmentations, which requires no additional new samples. In our experiments, we demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework, in particular, that considers postponing the augmentation to the end of RL training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
- 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 573
- 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
- 2020Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Datacited by 452
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
16 more
- 2018Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 345
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
- 2021Dataset Condensation with Differentiable Siamese Augmentationcited by 290
- 2019Improving Sample Efficiency in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning from Imagescited by 268
- 2020Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learningcited by 263
- 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 202
- 2017DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
- 2020Generalization in Reinforcement Learning by Soft Data Augmentationcited by 132
- 2019Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networkscited by 122
- 2020Self-Supervised Policy Adaptation during Deploymentcited by 121
- 2018Generalization and Regularization in DQNcited by 117
- 2020When Do Curricula Work?cited by 105
- 2019Network Randomization: A Simple Technique for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
- 2020Automatic Data Augmentation for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 71
- 2019Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergencecited by 54
- 2020Generating Automatic Curricula via Self-Supervised Active Domain Randomizationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3.
3 papers.