mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Estimation with Functional Confounders

arXiv 2102.08533 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2021stat.ME cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Causal inference relies on two fundamental assumptions: ignorability and positivity. We study causal inference when the true confounder value can be expressed as a function of the observed data; we call this setting estimation with functional confounders (EFC). In this setting, ignorability is satisfied, however positivity is violated, and causal inference is impossible in general. We consider two scenarios where causal effects are estimable. First, we discuss interventions on a part of the treatment called functional interventions and a sufficient condition for effect estimation of these interventions called functional positivity. Second, we develop conditions for nonparametric effect estimation based on the gradient fields of the functional confounder and the true outcome function. To estimate effects under these conditions, we develop Level-set Orthogonal Descent Estimation (LODE). Further, we prove error bounds on LODE's effect estimates, evaluate our methods on simulated and real data, and empirically demonstrate the value of EFC.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2021.

Builds on

2 of 31 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018The Blessings of Multiple Causescited by 103
  2. 2018Multiple Causal Inference with Latent Confoundingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.