mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Benefit of the Doubt: Uncertainty Aware Sensing for Edge Computing Platforms

arXiv 2102.05956 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.NIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks (NNs) lack measures of "reliability" estimation that would enable reasoning over their predictions. Despite the vital importance, especially in areas of human well-being and health, state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation techniques are computationally expensive when applied to resource-constrained devices. We propose an efficient framework for predictive uncertainty estimation in NNs deployed on embedded edge systems with no need for fine-tuning or re-training strategies. To meet the energy and latency requirements of these embedded platforms the framework is built from the ground up to provide predictive uncertainty based only on one forward pass and a negligible amount of additional matrix multiplications with theoretically proven correctness. Our aim is to enable already trained deep learning models to generate uncertainty estimates on resource-limited devices at inference time focusing on classification tasks. This framework is founded on theoretical developments casting dropout training as approximate inference in Bayesian NNs. Our layerwise distribution approximation to the convolution layer cascades through the network, providing uncertainty estimates in one single run which ensures minimal overhead, especially compared with uncertainty techniques that require multiple forwards passes and an equal linear rise in energy and latency requirements making them unsuitable in practice. We demonstrate that it yields better performance and flexibility over previous work based on multilayer perceptrons to obtain uncertainty estimates. Our evaluation with mobile applications datasets shows that our approach not only obtains robust and accurate uncertainty estimations but also outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of systems performance, reducing energy consumption (up to 28x), keeping the memory overhead at a minimum while still improving accuracy (up to 16%).

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2021.

Builds on

15 of 57 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 778
  5. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  6. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  7. 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
  8. 2018NetAdapt: Platform-Aware Neural Network Adaptation for Mobile Applicationscited by 146
  9. 2017Data Augmentation of Wearable Sensor Data for Parkinson's Disease Monitoring using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 130
  10. 2016Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 93
  11. 2016DeepSense: A Unified Deep Learning Framework for Time-Series Mobile Sensing Data Processingcited by 84
  12. 2018Meta-Learning for Stochastic Gradient MCMCcited by 16
3 more
  1. 2018DeepHeart: Semi-Supervised Sequence Learning for Cardiovascular Risk Predictioncited by 12
  2. 2020Mic2Mic: Using Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks to Overcome Microphone Variability in Speech Systemscited by 11
  3. 2019Contactless Cardiac Arrest Detection Using Smart Devicescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

4 papers.