A Survey on Industrial Control System Testbeds and Datasets for Security Research
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing digitization and interconnection of legacy Industrial Control Systems (ICSs) open new vulnerability surfaces, exposing such systems to malicious attackers. Furthermore, since ICSs are often employed in critical infrastructures (e.g., nuclear plants) and manufacturing companies (e.g., chemical industries), attacks can lead to devastating physical damages. In dealing with this security requirement, the research community focuses on developing new security mechanisms such as Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs), facilitated by leveraging modern machine learning techniques. However, these algorithms require a testing platform and a considerable amount of data to be trained and tested accurately. To satisfy this prerequisite, Academia, Industry, and Government are increasingly proposing testbed (i.e., scaled-down versions of ICSs or simulations) to test the performances of the IDSs. Furthermore, to enable researchers to cross-validate security systems (e.g., security-by-design concepts or anomaly detectors), several datasets have been collected from testbeds and shared with the community. In this paper, we provide a deep and comprehensive overview of ICSs, presenting the architecture design, the employed devices, and the security protocols implemented. We then collect, compare, and describe testbeds and datasets in the literature, highlighting key challenges and design guidelines to keep in mind in the design phases. Furthermore, we enrich our work by reporting the best performing IDS algorithms tested on every dataset to create a baseline in state of the art for this field. Finally, driven by knowledge accumulated during this survey's development, we report advice and good practices on the development, the choice, and the utilization of testbeds, datasets, and IDSs.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 13
- 2025Cyber-Physical Systems Security: A Comprehensive Review of Anomaly Detection Techniquescited by 4
- 2022On the Elements of Datasets for Cyber Physical Systems Securitycited by 1
- 2024A Generative Model Based Honeypot for Industrial OPC UA Communicationcited by 1
- 2025MALF: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Intelligent Fuzzing of Industrial Control Protocolscited by 1
- 2023Anomaly Detection Dataset for Industrial Control Systemscited by 0
- 2024Explainable Online Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems via Causal Discovery from Time Seriescited by 0
- 2025SimProcess: High Fidelity Simulation of Noisy ICS Physical Processescited by 0
- 2026Spatio-Temporal Attention Graph Neural Network: Explaining Causalities With Attentioncited by 0
- 2026IstGPT: LLM-based Anomaly Detection for Spatial-Temporal Graph in Industrial Systemscited by 0
- 2026IstGPT: LLM-based Anomaly Detection for Spatial-Temporal Graph in Industrial Systems1 Jun 2026
- 2026Spatio-Temporal Attention Graph Neural Network: Explaining Causalities With Attention11 Mar 2026
- 2025MALF: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Intelligent Fuzzing of Industrial Control Protocols3 Oct 2025
- 2025SimProcess: High Fidelity Simulation of Noisy ICS Physical Processes28 May 2025
- 2025Cyber-Physical Systems Security: A Comprehensive Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques18 Feb 2025
- 2024A Generative Model Based Honeypot for Industrial OPC UA Communication28 Oct 2024
- 2024Explainable Online Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems via Causal Discovery from Time Series15 Apr 2024
- 2023Anomaly Detection Dataset for Industrial Control Systems11 May 2023
- 2023SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection30 Apr 2023
- 2022On the Elements of Datasets for Cyber Physical Systems Security17 Aug 2022