mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing the Topological Defects of Disentanglement via Distributed Operators

arXiv 2102.05623 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A core challenge in Machine Learning is to learn to disentangle natural factors of variation in data (e.g. object shape vs. pose). A popular approach to disentanglement consists in learning to map each of these factors to distinct subspaces of a model's latent representation. However, this approach has shown limited empirical success to date. Here, we show that, for a broad family of transformations acting on images--encompassing simple affine transformations such as rotations and translations--this approach to disentanglement introduces topological defects (i.e. discontinuities in the encoder). Motivated by classical results from group representation theory, we study an alternative, more flexible approach to disentanglement which relies on distributed latent operators, potentially acting on the entire latent space. We theoretically and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach to disentangle affine transformations. Our work lays a theoretical foundation for the recent success of a new generation of models using distributed operators for disentanglement.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2021.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

References · 29

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  4. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  5. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  6. 2018Spherical CNNscited by 452
  7. 2020Generalizing Convolutional Neural Networks for Equivariance to Lie Groups on Arbitrary Continuous Datacited by 248
  8. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
  9. 2018A General Theory of Equivariant CNNs on Homogeneous Spacescited by 223
  10. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  11. 2018Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 188
  12. 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
17 more
  1. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  2. 2019Weakly Supervised Disentanglement with Guaranteescited by 82
  3. 2017Polar Transformer Networkscited by 81
  4. 2020Meta-Learning Symmetries by Reparameterizationcited by 75
  5. 2018Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encodingcited by 65
  6. 2020Attentive Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 62
  7. 2020Learning Invariances in Neural Networkscited by 52
  8. 2020Equivariant Neural Renderingcited by 47
  9. 2014Learning the Irreducible Representations of Commutative Lie Groupscited by 41
  10. 2020Variational Autoencoder with Learned Latent Structurecited by 41
  11. 2019Equivariant Transformer Networkscited by 35
  12. 2019Symmetry-Based Disentangled Representation Learning requires Interaction with Environmentscited by 35
  13. 2019Representing Closed Transformation Paths in Encoded Network Latent Spacecited by 17
  14. 2018Only Bayes should learn a manifold (on the estimation of differential geometric structure from data)cited by 16
  15. 2020Learning Group Structure and Disentangled Representations of Dynamical Environmentscited by 13
  16. 2017Unsupervised Transformation Learning via Convex Relaxationscited by 5
  17. 2019No Representation without Transformationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort: