mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Bridging the gap between Empirical and Certified Robustness against Adversarial Examples

arXiv 2102.05096 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The current state-of-the-art defense methods against adversarial examples typically focus on improving either empirical or certified robustness. Among them, adversarially trained (AT) models produce empirical state-of-the-art defense against adversarial examples without providing any robustness guarantees for large classifiers or higher-dimensional inputs. In contrast, existing randomized smoothing based models achieve state-of-the-art certified robustness while significantly degrading the empirical robustness against adversarial examples. In this paper, we propose a novel method, called Certification through Adaptation, that transforms an AT model into a randomized smoothing classifier during inference to provide certified robustness for ℓ2 norm without affecting their empirical robustness against adversarial attacks. We also propose Auto-Noise technique that efficiently approximates the appropriate noise levels to flexibly certify the test examples using randomized smoothing technique. Our proposed Certification through Adaptation with Auto-Noise technique achieves an textitaverage certified radius (ACR) scores up to 1.102 and 1.148 respectively for CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets using AT models without affecting their empirical robustness or benign accuracy. Therefore, our paper is a step towards bridging the gap between the empirical and certified robustness against adversarial examples by achieving both using the same classifier.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.

Builds on

60 of 83 references.

References · 60

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  9. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  10. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  11. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
38 more
  1. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  2. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  3. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  4. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  5. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  6. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  7. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  8. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  9. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  10. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  11. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
  12. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
  13. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  14. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  15. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
  16. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  17. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  18. 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
  19. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  20. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
  21. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
  22. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  23. 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
  24. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  25. 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
  26. 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
  27. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  28. 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 146
  29. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  30. 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
  31. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  32. 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
  33. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  34. 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
  35. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  36. 2018Decorrelated Batch Normalizationcited by 83
  37. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  38. 2017AutoDIAL: Automatic DomaIn Alignment Layerscited by 75

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.