Towards Bridging the gap between Empirical and Certified Robustness against Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The current state-of-the-art defense methods against adversarial examples typically focus on improving either empirical or certified robustness. Among them, adversarially trained (AT) models produce empirical state-of-the-art defense against adversarial examples without providing any robustness guarantees for large classifiers or higher-dimensional inputs. In contrast, existing randomized smoothing based models achieve state-of-the-art certified robustness while significantly degrading the empirical robustness against adversarial examples. In this paper, we propose a novel method, called Certification through Adaptation, that transforms an AT model into a randomized smoothing classifier during inference to provide certified robustness for ℓ2 norm without affecting their empirical robustness against adversarial attacks. We also propose Auto-Noise technique that efficiently approximates the appropriate noise levels to flexibly certify the test examples using randomized smoothing technique. Our proposed Certification through Adaptation with Auto-Noise technique achieves an textitaverage certified radius (ACR) scores up to 1.102 and 1.148 respectively for CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets using AT models without affecting their empirical robustness or benign accuracy. Therefore, our paper is a step towards bridging the gap between the empirical and certified robustness against adversarial examples by achieving both using the same classifier.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.
Builds on
60 of 83 references.
References · 60
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
38 more
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
- 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
- 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
- 2018Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attackscited by 221
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 178
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
- 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 146
- 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
- 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
- 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
- 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
- 2020MACER: Attack-free and Scalable Robust Training via Maximizing Certified Radiuscited by 114
- 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
- 2018Decorrelated Batch Normalizationcited by 83
- 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
- 2017AutoDIAL: Automatic DomaIn Alignment Layerscited by 75
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.