mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Bandit Learning with Imperfect Context

arXiv 2102.05018 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A standard assumption in contextual multi-arm bandit is that the true context is perfectly known before arm selection. Nonetheless, in many practical applications (e.g., cloud resource management), prior to arm selection, the context information can only be acquired by prediction subject to errors or adversarial modification. In this paper, we study a contextual bandit setting in which only imperfect context is available for arm selection while the true context is revealed at the end of each round. We propose two robust arm selection algorithms: MaxMinUCB (Maximize Minimum UCB) which maximizes the worst-case reward, and MinWD (Minimize Worst-case Degradation) which minimizes the worst-case regret. Importantly, we analyze the robustness of MaxMinUCB and MinWD by deriving both regret and reward bounds compared to an oracle that knows the true context. Our results show that as time goes on, MaxMinUCB and MinWD both perform as asymptotically well as their optimal counterparts that know the reward function. Finally, we apply MaxMinUCB and MinWD to online edge datacenter selection, and run synthetic simulations to validate our theoretical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.

Builds on

25 of 57 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
  3. 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
  4. 2015Online Optimization : Competing with Dynamic Comparatorscited by 99
  5. 2020Sequential Batch Learning in Finite-Action Linear Contextual Banditscited by 63
  6. 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 61
  7. 2020Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 60
  8. 2016Conservative Banditscited by 58
  9. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 56
  10. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
  11. 2016An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial banditscited by 47
  12. 2017Multi-Task Learning for Contextual Banditscited by 47
13 more
  1. 2020Efficient and Robust Algorithms for Adversarial Linear Contextual Banditscited by 42
  2. 2016Efficient Algorithms for Adversarial Contextual Learningcited by 32
  3. 2018Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Banditscited by 23
  4. 2016Refined Lower Bounds for Adversarial Banditscited by 20
  5. 2020Distributionally Robust Batch Contextual Banditscited by 20
  6. 2019Exploiting Vulnerabilities of Load Forecasting Through Adversarial Attackscited by 18
  7. 2019Stochastic Bandits with Context Distributionscited by 18
  8. 2020Distributionally Robust Bayesian Quadrature Optimizationcited by 15
  9. 2020Robust Stochastic Bandit Algorithms under Probabilistic Unbounded Adversarial Attackcited by 13
  10. 2018Robust Actor-Critic Contextual Bandit for Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventionscited by 9
  11. 2017Online Learning for Offloading and Autoscaling in Energy Harvesting Mobile Edge Computingcited by 7
  12. 2019Budget-constrained Edge Service Provisioning with Demand Estimation via Bandit Learningcited by 5
  13. 2018Spatio-temporal Edge Service Placement: A Bandit Learning Approachcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

8 papers.