mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Extracting the Auditory Attention in a Dual-Speaker Scenario from EEG using a Joint CNN-LSTM Model

arXiv 2102.03957 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2021cs.SD cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human brain performs remarkably well in segregating a particular speaker from interfering ones in a multi-speaker scenario. It has been recently shown that we can quantitatively evaluate the segregation capability by modelling the relationship between the speech signals present in an auditory scene and the cortical signals of the listener measured using electroencephalography (EEG). This has opened up avenues to integrate neuro-feedback into hearing aids whereby the device can infer user's attention and enhance the attended speaker. Commonly used algorithms to infer the auditory attention are based on linear systems theory where the speech cues such as envelopes are mapped on to the EEG signals. Here, we present a joint convolutional neural network (CNN) - long short-term memory (LSTM) model to infer the auditory attention. Our joint CNN-LSTM model takes the EEG signals and the spectrogram of the multiple speakers as inputs and classifies the attention to one of the speakers. We evaluated the reliability of our neural network using three different datasets comprising of 61 subjects where, each subject undertook a dual-speaker experiment. The three datasets analysed corresponded to speech stimuli presented in three different languages namely German, Danish and Dutch. Using the proposed joint CNN-LSTM model, we obtained a median decoding accuracy of 77.2% at a trial duration of three seconds. Furthermore, we evaluated the amount of sparsity that our model can tolerate by means of magnitude pruning and found that the model can tolerate up to 50% sparsity without substantial loss of decoding accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2021.

Builds on

16 of 64 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  4. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  5. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  6. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  7. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
  8. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
  9. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  10. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
  11. 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
  12. 2020Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 225
4 more
  1. 2017Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overviewcited by 213
  2. 2018Looking to Listen at the Cocktail Party: A Speaker-Independent Audio-Visual Model for Speech Separationcited by 160
  3. 2020An LSTM Based Architecture to Relate Speech Stimulus to EEGcited by 9
  4. 2021Inference of the Selective Auditory Attention using Sequential LMMSE Estimationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.