mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Breast Lesion Detection in Ultrafast DCE-MRI Using Deep Learning

arXiv 2102.03932 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: We propose a deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CADe) method to detect breast lesions in ultrafast DCE-MRI sequences. This method uses both the three-dimensional spatial information and temporal information obtained from the early-phase of the dynamic acquisition. Methods: The proposed CADe method, based on a modified 3D RetinaNet model, operates on ultrafast T1 weighted sequences, which are preprocessed for motion compensation, temporal normalization, and are cropped before passing into the model. The model is optimized to enable the detection of relatively small breast lesions in a screening setting, focusing on detection of lesions that are harder to differentiate from confounding structures inside the breast. Results: The method was developed based on a dataset consisting of 489 ultrafast MRI studies obtained from 462 patients containing a total of 572 lesions (365 malignant, 207 benign) and achieved a detection rate, sensitivity, and detection rate of benign lesions of 0.90 (0.876-0.934), 0.95 (0.934-0.980), and 0.81 (0.751-0.871) at 4 false positives per normal breast with 10-fold cross-testing, respectively. Conclusions: The deep learning architecture used for the proposed CADe application can efficiently detect benign and malignant lesions on ultrafast DCE-MRI. Furthermore, utilizing the less visible hard-to detect-lesions in training improves the learning process and, subsequently, detection of malignant breast lesions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2021.

Builds on

5 of 34 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  5. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.