Undecidability of Underfitting in Learning Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Using recent machine learning results that present an information-theoretic perspective on underfitting and overfitting, we prove that deciding whether an encodable learning algorithm will always underfit a dataset, even if given unlimited training time, is undecidable. We discuss the importance of this result and potential topics for further research, including information-theoretic and probabilistic strategies for bounding learning algorithm fit.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2021.
Builds on
4 of 13 references.
References · 4
- 2020An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Overfitting and Underfittingcited by 6
- 2019The Bias-Expressivity Trade-offcited by 2
- 2020Decidability of Sample Complexity of PAC Learning in finite settingcited by 2
- 2019The Labeling Distribution Matrix (LDM): A Tool for Estimating Machine Learning Algorithm Capacitycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Impossibility Results in AI: A Surveycited by 13
- 2024AdaAugment: A Tuning-Free and Adaptive Approach to Enhance Data Augmentationcited by 7
- 2021From Undecidability of Non-Triviality and Finiteness to Undecidability of Learnabilitycited by 4
- 2024Le Nozze di Giustizia. Interactions between Artificial Intelligence, Law, Logic, Language and Computation with some case studies in Traffic Regulations and Health Carecited by 0
- 2024AdaAugment: A Tuning-Free and Adaptive Approach to Enhance Data Augmentation19 May 2024
- 2024Le Nozze di Giustizia. Interactions between Artificial Intelligence, Law, Logic, Language and Computation with some case studies in Traffic Regulations and Health Care9 Feb 2024
- 2021Impossibility Results in AI: A Survey1 Sep 2021
- 2021From Undecidability of Non-Triviality and Finiteness to Undecidability of Learnability2 Jun 2021