mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Pitfall of More Powerful Autoencoders in Lidar-Based Navigation

arXiv 2102.02127 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2021cs.RO cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The benefit of pretrained autoencoders for reinforcement learning in comparison to training on raw observations is already known [1]. In this paper, we address the generation of a compact and information-rich state representation. In particular, we train a variational autoencoder for 2D-lidar scans to use its latent state for reinforcement learning of navigation tasks. To achieve high reconstruction power of our autoencoding pipeline, we propose an - in the context of autoencoding 2D-lidar scans - novel preprocessing into a local binary occupancy image. This has no additional requirements, neither self-localization nor robust mapping, and therefore can be applied in any setting and easily transferred from simulation in real-world. In a second stage, we show the usage of the compact state representation generated by our autoencoding pipeline in a simplistic navigation task and expose the pitfall that increased reconstruction power will always lead to an improved performance. We implemented our approach in python using tensorflow. Our datasets are simulated with pybullet as well as recorded using a slamtec rplidar A3. The experiments show the significantly improved reconstruction capabilities of our approach for 2D-lidar scans w.r.t. the state of the art. However, as we demonstrate in the experiments the impact on reinforcement learning in lidar-based navigation tasks is non-predictable when improving the latent state representation generated by an autoencoding pipeline. This is surprising and needs to be taken into account during the process of optimizing a pretrained autoencoder for reinforcement learning tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2018World Modelscited by 1,444
  5. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
  6. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  7. 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 400
  8. 2019Improving Sample Efficiency in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning from Imagescited by 268
  9. 2019Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable Modelcited by 228
  10. 2018Crowd-Robot Interaction: Crowd-aware Robot Navigation with Attention-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 162
  11. 2015Deep Spatial Autoencoders for Visuomotor Learningcited by 149
  12. 2017TensorFlow Distributionscited by 105
4 more
  1. 2018Deep Generative Modeling of LiDAR Datacited by 70
  2. 2016From Perception to Decision: A Data-driven Approach to End-to-end Motion Planning for Autonomous Ground Robotscited by 37
  3. 2020CAE-LO: LiDAR Odometry Leveraging Fully Unsupervised Convolutional Auto-Encoder for Interest Point Detection and Feature Descriptioncited by 4
  4. 2018Hallucinating robots: Inferring Obstacle Distances from Partial Laser Measurementscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.