mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predictive coding feedback results in perceived illusory contours in a recurrent neural network

arXiv 2102.01955 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2021cs.CV q-bio.NCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern feedforward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can now solve some computer vision tasks at super-human levels. However, these networks only roughly mimic human visual perception. One difference from human vision is that they do not appear to perceive illusory contours (e.g. Kanizsa squares) in the same way humans do. Physiological evidence from visual cortex suggests that the perception of illusory contours could involve feedback connections. Would recurrent feedback neural networks perceive illusory contours like humans? In this work we equip a deep feedforward convolutional network with brain-inspired recurrent dynamics. The network was first pretrained with an unsupervised reconstruction objective on a natural image dataset, to expose it to natural object contour statistics. Then, a classification decision layer was added and the model was finetuned on a form discrimination task: squares vs. randomly oriented inducer shapes (no illusory contour). Finally, the model was tested with the unfamiliar ''illusory contour'' configuration: inducer shapes oriented to form an illusory square. Compared with feedforward baselines, the iterative ''predictive coding'' feedback resulted in more illusory contours being classified as physical squares. The perception of the illusory contour was measurable in the luminance profile of the image reconstructions produced by the model, demonstrating that the model really ''sees'' the illusion. Ablation studies revealed that natural image pretraining and feedback error correction are both critical to the perception of the illusion. Finally we validated our conclusions in a deeper network (VGG): adding the same predictive coding feedback dynamics again leads to the perception of illusory contours.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.

Builds on

17 of 69 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  5. 2016Deep Predictive Coding Networks for Video Prediction and Unsupervised Learningcited by 203
  6. 2014Difference Target Propagationcited by 144
  7. 2018Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated-recurrent unitscited by 98
  8. 2020Predictive Coding Approximates Backprop along Arbitrary Computation Graphscited by 89
  9. 2016Towards an integration of deep learning and neurosciencecited by 77
  10. 2016Neural Encoding and Decoding with Deep Learning for Dynamic Natural Visioncited by 58
  11. 2019Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual systemcited by 58
  12. 2018Deep Predictive Coding Network for Object Recognitioncited by 23
5 more
  1. 2020Neural Networks with Recurrent Generative Feedbackcited by 23
  2. 2020GAIT-prop: A biologically plausible learning rule derived from backpropagation of errorcited by 15
  3. 2013Deep Predictive Coding Networkscited by 13
  4. 2018A neural network trained to predict future video frames mimics critical properties of biological neuronal responses and perceptioncited by 6
  5. 2015Predictive coding: A Possible Explanation of Filling-in at the blind spotcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.