Leave No User Behind: Towards Improving the Utility of Recommender Systems for Non-mainstream Users
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In a collaborative-filtering recommendation scenario, biases in the data will likely propagate in the learned recommendations. In this paper we focus on the so-called mainstream bias: the tendency of a recommender system to provide better recommendations to users who have a mainstream taste, as opposed to non-mainstream users. We propose NAECF, a conceptually simple but effective idea to address this bias. The idea consists of adding an autoencoder (AE) layer when learning user and item representations with text-based Convolutional Neural Networks. The AEs, one for the users and one for the items, serve as adversaries to the process of minimizing the rating prediction error when learning how to recommend. They enforce that the specific unique properties of all users and items are sufficiently well incorporated and preserved in the learned representations. These representations, extracted as the bottlenecks of the corresponding AEs, are expected to be less biased towards mainstream users, and to provide more balanced recommendation utility across all users. Our experimental results confirm these expectations, significantly improving the recommendations for non-mainstream users while maintaining the recommendation quality for mainstream users. Our results emphasize the importance of deploying extensive content-based features, such as online reviews, in order to better represent users and items to maximize the de-biasing effect.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 7.
11 papers.
- 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
- 2024CoRAL: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models Improve Long-tail Recommendationcited by 44
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 42
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
- 2024Leave No Patient Behind: Enhancing Medication Recommendation for Rare Disease Patientscited by 11
- 2024Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explainedcited by 10
- 2024Intersectional Two-sided Fairness in Recommendationcited by 8
- 2023Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluationcited by 2
- 2024Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspectivecited by 2
- 2024DifFaiRec: Generative Fair Recommender with Conditional Diffusion Modelcited by 2
- 2024Countering Mainstream Bias via End-to-End Adaptive Local Learningcited by 0
- 2024DifFaiRec: Generative Fair Recommender with Conditional Diffusion Model18 Sep 2024
- 2024Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained26 Jul 2024
- 2024Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective26 Apr 2024
- 2024Countering Mainstream Bias via End-to-End Adaptive Local Learning13 Apr 2024
- 2024Leave No Patient Behind: Enhancing Medication Recommendation for Rare Disease Patients26 Mar 2024
- 2024CoRAL: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models Improve Long-tail Recommendation11 Mar 2024
- 2024Intersectional Two-sided Fairness in Recommendation5 Feb 2024
- 2023A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems2 Aug 2023
- 2023Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation16 May 2023
- 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendation12 May 2023
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems21 Sep 2022