mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Forensicability of Deep Neural Network Inference Pipelines

arXiv 2102.00921 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.CR cs.MMcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose methods to infer properties of the execution environment of machine learning pipelines by tracing characteristic numerical deviations in observable outputs. Results from a series of proof-of-concept experiments obtained on local and cloud-hosted machines give rise to possible forensic applications, such as the identification of the hardware platform used to produce deep neural network predictions. Finally, we introduce boundary samples that amplify the numerical deviations in order to distinguish machines by their predicted label only.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2021.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  7. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  8. 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 208
  9. 2018Slalom: Fast, Verifiable and Private Execution of Neural Networks in Trusted Hardwarecited by 101
  10. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  11. 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.