mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Priority-based Post-Processing Bias Mitigation for Individual and Group Fairness

arXiv 2102.00417 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2021cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous post-processing bias mitigation algorithms on both group and individual fairness don't work on regression models and datasets with multi-class numerical labels. We propose a priority-based post-processing bias mitigation on both group and individual fairness with the notion that similar individuals should get similar outcomes irrespective of socio-economic factors and more the unfairness, more the injustice. We establish this proposition by a case study on tariff allotment in a smart grid. Our novel framework establishes it by using a user segmentation algorithm to capture the consumption strategy better. This process ensures priority-based fair pricing for group and individual facing the maximum injustice. It upholds the notion of fair tariff allotment to the entire population taken into consideration without modifying the in-built process for tariff calculation. We also validate our method and show superior performance to previous work on a real-world dataset in criminal sentencing.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2021.

Builds on

8 of 18 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  5. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 148
  6. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  7. 2018From Soft Classifiers to Hard Decisions: How fair can we be?cited by 16
  8. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Fair Dynamic Pricingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2.

3 papers.