mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Low Complexity Approximate Bayesian Logistic Regression for Sparse Online Learning

arXiv 2101.12113 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Theoretical results show that Bayesian methods can achieve lower bounds on regret for online logistic regression. In practice, however, such techniques may not be feasible especially for very large feature sets. Various approximations that, for huge sparse feature sets, diminish the theoretical advantages, must be used. Often, they apply stochastic gradient methods with hyper-parameters that must be tuned on some surrogate loss, defeating theoretical advantages of Bayesian methods. The surrogate loss, defined to approximate the mixture, requires techniques as Monte Carlo sampling, increasing computations per example. We propose low complexity analytical approximations for sparse online logistic and probit regressions. Unlike variational inference and other methods, our methods use analytical closed forms, substantially lowering computations. Unlike dense solutions, as Gaussian Mixtures, our methods allow for sparse problems with huge feature sets without increasing complexity. With the analytical closed forms, there is also no need for applying stochastic gradient methods on surrogate losses, and for tuning and balancing learning and regularization hyper-parameters. Empirical results top the performance of the more computationally involved methods. Like such methods, our methods still reveal per feature and per example uncertainty measures.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2021.

Builds on

19 of 71 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  4. 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
  5. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  6. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  7. 2017Variational Continual Learningcited by 335
  8. 2013Black Box Variational Inferencecited by 317
  9. 2013Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inferencecited by 172
  10. 2016Coin Betting and Parameter-Free Online Learningcited by 131
  11. 2013Non-strongly-convex smooth stochastic approximation with convergence rate O(1/n)cited by 110
  12. 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 68
7 more
  1. 2013Streaming Variational Bayescited by 46
  2. 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 40
  3. 2013Adaptivity of averaged stochastic gradient descent to local strong convexity for logistic regressioncited by 32
  4. 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 30
  5. 2020Efficient improper learning for online logistic regressioncited by 16
  6. 2015Stochastic gradient variational Bayes for gamma approximating distributionscited by 9
  7. 2020Logistic Regression Regret: What's the Catch?cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.