mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating the significance of adversarial attacks and their relation to interpretability for radar-based human activity recognition systems

arXiv 2101.10562 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2021cs.CV cs.LG cs.MMcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given their substantial success in addressing a wide range of computer vision challenges, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are increasingly being used in smart home applications, with many of these applications relying on the automatic recognition of human activities. In this context, low-power radar devices have recently gained in popularity as recording sensors, given that the usage of these devices allows mitigating a number of privacy concerns, a key issue when making use of conventional video cameras. Another concern that is often cited when designing smart home applications is the resilience of these applications against cyberattacks. It is, for instance, well-known that the combination of images and CNNs is vulnerable against adversarial examples, mischievous data points that force machine learning models to generate wrong classifications during testing time. In this paper, we investigate the vulnerability of radar-based CNNs to adversarial attacks, and where these radar-based CNNs have been designed to recognize human gestures. Through experiments with four unique threat models, we show that radar-based CNNs are susceptible to both white- and black-box adversarial attacks. We also expose the existence of an extreme adversarial attack case, where it is possible to change the prediction made by the radar-based CNNs by only perturbing the padding of the inputs, without touching the frames where the action itself occurs. Moreover, we observe that gradient-based attacks exercise perturbation not randomly, but on important features of the input data. We highlight these important features by making use of Grad-CAM, a popular neural network interpretability method, hereby showing the connection between adversarial perturbation and prediction interpretability.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2021.

Builds on

36 of 57 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  10. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  11. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  12. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
24 more
  1. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  2. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  5. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  6. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  7. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  8. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  9. 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
  10. 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  12. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  13. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
  14. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  15. 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 249
  16. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  17. 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 165
  18. 2018AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networkscited by 137
  19. 2019Improving Black-box Adversarial Attacks with a Transfer-based Priorcited by 121
  20. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  21. 2018Attacks Meet Interpretability: Attribute-steered Detection of Adversarial Samplescited by 38
  22. 2017Deep Residual Bidir-LSTM for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensorscited by 24
  23. 2019Perceptual Quality-preserving Black-Box Attack against Deep Learning Image Classifierscited by 8
  24. 2020Perturbation Analysis of Gradient-based Adversarial Attackscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.