mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ISP Distillation

arXiv 2101.10203 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, many of the images captured are `observed' by machines only and not by humans, e.g., in autonomous systems. High-level machine vision models, such as object recognition or semantic segmentation, assume images are transformed into some canonical image space by the camera ansImage Signal Processor (ISP). However, the camera ISP is optimized for producing visually pleasing images for human observers and not for machines. Therefore, one may spare the ISP compute time and apply vision models directly to RAW images. Yet, it has been shown that training such models directly on RAW images results in a performance drop. To mitigate this drop, we use a RAW and RGB image pairs dataset, which can be easily acquired with no human labeling. We then train a model that is applied directly to the RAW data by using knowledge distillation such that the model predictions for RAW images will be aligned with the predictions of an off-the-shelf pre-trained model for processed RGB images. Our experiments show that our performance on RAW images for object classification and semantic segmentation is significantly better than models trained on labeled RAW images. It also reasonably matches the predictions of a pre-trained model on processed RGB images, while saving the ISP compute overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2021.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  7. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  8. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
  9. 2018Learning to See in the Darkcited by 459
  10. 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
  11. 2018DeepISP: Towards Learning an End-to-End Image Processing Pipelinecited by 88
  12. 2018Label Refinery: Improving ImageNet Classification through Label Progressioncited by 65
10 more
  1. 2017Dirty Pixels: Towards End-to-End Image Processing and Perceptioncited by 42
  2. 2017Reconfiguring the Imaging Pipeline for Computer Visioncited by 32
  3. 2019VisionISP: Repurposing the Image Signal Processor for Computer Vision Applicationscited by 18
  4. 2020Dynamic Low-light Imaging with Quanta Image Sensorscited by 16
  5. 2017Classification Driven Dynamic Image Enhancementcited by 15
  6. 2020Image Classification in the Dark using Quanta Image Sensorscited by 15
  7. 2017DeepCorrect: Correcting DNN models against Image Distortionscited by 14
  8. 2019ISP4ML: Understanding the Role of Image Signal Processing in Efficient Deep Learning Vision Systemscited by 3
  9. 2018Generative Sensing: Transforming Unreliable Sensor Data for Reliable Recognitioncited by 1
  10. 2020Focus-and-Expand: Training Guidance Through Gradual Manipulation of Input Featurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

7 papers.