mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Censorship of Online Encyclopedias: Implications for NLP Models

arXiv 2101.09294 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While artificial intelligence provides the backbone for many tools people use around the world, recent work has brought to attention that the algorithms powering AI are not free of politics, stereotypes, and bias. While most work in this area has focused on the ways in which AI can exacerbate existing inequalities and discrimination, very little work has studied how governments actively shape training data. We describe how censorship has affected the development of Wikipedia corpuses, text data which are regularly used for pre-trained inputs into NLP algorithms. We show that word embeddings trained on Baidu Baike, an online Chinese encyclopedia, have very different associations between adjectives and a range of concepts about democracy, freedom, collective action, equality, and people and historical events in China than its regularly blocked but uncensored counterpart - Chinese language Wikipedia. We examine the implications of these discrepancies by studying their use in downstream AI applications. Our paper shows how government repression, censorship, and self-censorship may impact training data and the applications that draw from them.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2021.

Builds on

21 of 59 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  6. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  7. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  10. 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integrationcited by 301
  11. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  12. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
9 more
  1. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  2. 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 219
  3. 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
  4. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
  5. 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 125
  6. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  7. 2019Garbage In, Garbage Out? Do Machine Learning Application Papers in Social Computing Report Where Human-Labeled Training Data Comes From?cited by 64
  8. 2018Analogical Reasoning on Chinese Morphological and Semantic Relationscited by 50
  9. 2019NEZHA: Neural Contextualized Representation for Chinese Language Understandingcited by 39

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.