Analyzing Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty for Drusen Segmentation in Optical Coherence Tomography Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of permanent vision loss in people aged over 60 years. Accurate segmentation of biomarkers such as drusen that points to the early stages of AMD is crucial in preventing further vision impairment. However, segmenting drusen is extremely challenging due to their varied sizes and appearances, low contrast and noise resemblance. Most existing literature, therefore, have focused on size estimation of drusen using classification, leaving the challenge of accurate segmentation less tackled. Additionally, obtaining the pixel-wise annotations is extremely costly and such labels can often be noisy, suffering from inter-observer and intra-observer variability. Quantification of uncertainty associated with segmentation tasks offers principled measures to inspect the segmentation output. Realizing its utility in identifying erroneous segmentation and the potential applications in clinical decision making, here we develop a U-Net based drusen segmentation model and quantify the segmentation uncertainty. We investigate epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty capturing model confidence and data uncertainty respectively. We present segmentation results and show how uncertainty can help formulate robust evaluation strategies. We visually inspect the pixel-wise uncertainty and segmentation results on test images. We finally analyze the correlation between segmentation uncertainty and accuracy. Our results demonstrate the utility of leveraging uncertainties in developing and explaining segmentation models for medical image analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2021.
Builds on
8 of 17 references.
References · 8
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 227
- 2016The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 126
- 2019Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCTcited by 42
- 2018DeepSeeNet: A deep learning model for automated classification of patient-based age-related macular degeneration severity from color fundus photographscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Assessing the performance of deep learning-based models for prostate cancer segmentation using uncertainty scorescited by 0
- 2024Uncertainty quantification for White Matter Hyperintensity segmentation detects silent failures and improves automated Fazekas quantificationcited by 0
- 2025Bayesian Deep Learning Approaches for Uncertainty-Aware Retinal OCT Image Segmentation for Multiple Sclerosiscited by 0
- 2025Bayesian Deep Learning Approaches for Uncertainty-Aware Retinal OCT Image Segmentation for Multiple Sclerosis17 May 2025
- 2024Uncertainty quantification for White Matter Hyperintensity segmentation detects silent failures and improves automated Fazekas quantification26 Nov 2024
- 2023Assessing the performance of deep learning-based models for prostate cancer segmentation using uncertainty scores9 Aug 2023