Uniform Error and Posterior Variance Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression with Application to Safe Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In application areas where data generation is expensive, Gaussian processes are a preferred supervised learning model due to their high data-efficiency. Particularly in model-based control, Gaussian processes allow the derivation of performance guarantees using probabilistic model error bounds. To make these approaches applicable in practice, two open challenges must be solved i) Existing error bounds rely on prior knowledge, which might not be available for many real-world tasks. (ii) The relationship between training data and the posterior variance, which mainly drives the error bound, is not well understood and prevents the asymptotic analysis. This article addresses these issues by presenting a novel uniform error bound using Lipschitz continuity and an analysis of the posterior variance function for a large class of kernels. Additionally, we show how these results can be used to guarantee safe control of an unknown dynamical system and provide numerical illustration examples.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2021.
Builds on
13 of 57 references.
References · 13
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 192
- 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
- 2018Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Explorationcited by 120
- 2015Safe Controller Optimization for Quadrotors with Gaussian Processescited by 78
- 2019Uniform Error Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression with Application to Safe Controlcited by 64
- 2016Safe Learning of Regions of Attraction for Uncertain, Nonlinear Systems with Gaussian Processescited by 39
- 2015An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Drivingcited by 35
- 2019Feedback Linearization based on Gaussian Processes with event-triggered Online Learningcited by 24
- 2017Gaussian Process bandits with adaptive discretizationcited by 21
- 2018Provably Robust Learning-Based Approach for High-Accuracy Tracking Control of Lagrangian Systemscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Residual Gaussian Process: A Tractable Nonparametric Bayesian Emulator for Multi-fidelity Simulationscited by 8
- 2023Toward L_∞-recovery of Nonlinear Functions: A Polynomial Sample Complexity Bound for Gaussian Random Fieldscited by 4
- 2024Efficiently Computable Safety Bounds for Gaussian Processes in Active Learningcited by 2
- 2023Stochastic Cell Transmission Models of Traffic Networkscited by 1
- 2023Modeling Epidemic Spread: A Gaussian Process Regression Approachcited by 0
- 2024Quantifying Local Model Validity using Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Quadratic Order Reduction -- Gaussian Process Ordinary Differential Equation framework for the inference of Large Continuous Dynamical Systemscited by 0
- 2026A Quadratic Order Reduction -- Gaussian Process Ordinary Differential Equation framework for the inference of Large Continuous Dynamical Systems11 Jun 2026
- 2024Quantifying Local Model Validity using Active Learning11 Jun 2024
- 2024Efficiently Computable Safety Bounds for Gaussian Processes in Active Learning28 Feb 2024
- 2023Modeling Epidemic Spread: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach14 Dec 2023
- 2023Toward L_∞-recovery of Nonlinear Functions: A Polynomial Sample Complexity Bound for Gaussian Random Fields29 Apr 2023
- 2023Stochastic Cell Transmission Models of Traffic Networks23 Apr 2023
- 2021Residual Gaussian Process: A Tractable Nonparametric Bayesian Emulator for Multi-fidelity Simulations8 Apr 2021