mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Vulnerability of Semantic Segmentation Networks to Adversarial Attacks in Autonomous Driving: Enhancing Extensive Environment Sensing

arXiv 2101.03924 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2021cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enabling autonomous driving (AD) can be considered one of the biggest challenges in today's technology. AD is a complex task accomplished by several functionalities, with environment perception being one of its core functions. Environment perception is usually performed by combining the semantic information captured by several sensors, i.e., lidar or camera. The semantic information from the respective sensor can be extracted by using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for dense prediction. In the past, CNNs constantly showed state-of-the-art performance on several vision-related tasks, such as semantic segmentation of traffic scenes using nothing but the red-green-blue (RGB) images provided by a camera. Although CNNs obtain state-of-the-art performance on clean images, almost imperceptible changes to the input, referred to as adversarial perturbations, may lead to fatal deception. The goal of this article is to illuminate the vulnerability aspects of CNNs used for semantic segmentation with respect to adversarial attacks, and share insights into some of the existing known adversarial defense strategies. We aim to clarify the advantages and disadvantages associated with applying CNNs for environment perception in AD to serve as a motivation for future research in this field.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.

Builds on

20 of 30 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  7. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  8. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  9. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  10. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  11. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
  12. 2017ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Imagescited by 261
8 more
  1. 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
  2. 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
  3. 2018Generalizable Data-free Objective for Crafting Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 88
  4. 2017Fast Feature Fool: A data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbationscited by 66
  5. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 61
  6. 2018A Game-Based Approximate Verification of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 33
  7. 2018Verification of deep probabilistic modelscited by 8
  8. 2019The Attack Generator: A Systematic Approach Towards Constructing Adversarial Attackscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 3.

12 papers.