Boundary Conditions for Linear Exit Time Gradient Trajectories Around Saddle Points: Analysis and Algorithm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient-related first-order methods have become the workhorse of large-scale numerical optimization problems. Many of these problems involve nonconvex objective functions with multiple saddle points, which necessitates an understanding of the behavior of discrete trajectories of first-order methods within the geometrical landscape of these functions. This paper concerns convergence of first-order discrete methods to a local minimum of nonconvex optimization problems that comprise strict-saddle points within the geometrical landscape. To this end, it focuses on analysis of discrete gradient trajectories around saddle neighborhoods, derives sufficient conditions under which these trajectories can escape strict-saddle neighborhoods in linear time, explores the contractive and expansive dynamics of these trajectories in neighborhoods of strict-saddle points that are characterized by gradients of moderate magnitude, characterizes the non-curving nature of these trajectories, and highlights the inability of these trajectories to re-enter the neighborhoods around strict-saddle points after exiting them. Based on these insights and analyses, the paper then proposes a simple variant of the vanilla gradient descent algorithm, termed Curvature Conditioned Regularized Gradient Descent (CCRGD) algorithm, which utilizes a check for an initial boundary condition to ensure its trajectories can escape strict-saddle neighborhoods in linear time. Convergence analysis of the CCRGD algorithm, which includes its rate of convergence to a local minimum, is also presented in the paper. Numerical experiments are then provided on a test function as well as a low-rank matrix factorization problem to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2021.
Builds on
16 of 40 references.
References · 16
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2017Gradient Descent Can Take Exponential Time to Escape Saddle Pointscited by 74
- 2017Accelerated Gradient Descent Escapes Saddle Points Faster than Gradient Descentcited by 66
- 2018Escaping Saddles with Stochastic Gradientscited by 66
- 2017Natasha 2: Faster Non-Convex Optimization Than SGDcited by 49
- 2019Sharp Analysis for Nonconvex SGD Escaping from Saddle Pointscited by 40
- 2017Neon2: Finding Local Minima via First-Order Oraclescited by 36
- 2019First-order methods almost always avoid saddle points: the case of vanishing step-sizescited by 35
- 2020On Learning Rates and Schr"odinger Operatorscited by 33
- 2017First-order Stochastic Algorithms for Escaping From Saddle Points in Almost Linear Timecited by 29
- 2016Gradient Descent Converges to Minimizerscited by 25
- 2016Efficient approaches for escaping higher order saddle points in non-convex optimizationcited by 23
4 more
- 2018Escaping Saddle Points in Constrained Optimizationcited by 14
- 2017A Generic Approach for Escaping Saddle pointscited by 13
- 2017A Newton-Based Method for Nonconvex Optimization with Fast Evasion of Saddle Pointscited by 12
- 2020Exit Time Analysis for Approximations of Gradient Descent Trajectories Around Saddle Pointscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.