ISETAuto: Detecting vehicles with depth and radiance information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous driving applications use two types of sensor systems to identify vehicles - depth sensing LiDAR and radiance sensing cameras. We compare the performance (average precision) of a ResNet for vehicle detection in complex, daytime, driving scenes when the input is a depth map (D = d(x,y)), a radiance image (L = r(x,y)), or both [D,L]. (1) When the spatial sampling resolution of the depth map and radiance image are equal to typical camera resolutions, a ResNet detects vehicles at higher average precision from depth than radiance. (2) As the spatial sampling of the depth map declines to the range of current LiDAR devices, the ResNet average precision is higher for radiance than depth. (3) For a hybrid system that combines a depth map and radiance image, the average precision is higher than using depth or radiance alone. We established these observations in simulation and then confirmed them using realworld data. The advantage of combining depth and radiance can be explained by noting that the two type of information have complementary weaknesses. The radiance data are limited by dynamic range and motion blur. The LiDAR data have relatively low spatial resolution. The ResNet combines the two data sources effectively to improve overall vehicle detection.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2021.
Builds on
18 of 41 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 517
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
- 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 313
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2020LiDARsim: Realistic LiDAR Simulation by Leveraging the Real Worldcited by 137
- 2014Learning Rich Features from RGB-D Images for Object Detection and Segmentationcited by 124
- 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 119
- 2018LIDAR-Camera Fusion for Road Detection Using Fully Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 41
- 2018Augmented LiDAR Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 41
6 more
- 2020Real-time Fusion Network for RGB-D Semantic Segmentation Incorporating Unexpected Obstacle Detection for Road-driving Imagescited by 36
- 2019Gated2Depth: Real-time Dense Lidar from Gated Imagescited by 23
- 2019Neural Network Generalization: The impact of camera parameterscited by 14
- 2016Exploiting Depth from Single Monocular Images for Object Detection and Semantic Segmentationcited by 10
- 2019Soft Prototyping Camera Designs for Car Detection Based on a Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 7
- 2019A system for generating complex physically accurate sensor images for automotive applicationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
3 papers.