Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Broader disclosive transparency-truth and clarity in communication regarding the function of AI systems-is widely considered desirable. Unfortunately, it is a nebulous concept, difficult to both define and quantify. This is problematic, as previous work has demonstrated possible trade-offs and negative consequences to disclosive transparency, such as a confusion effect, where "too much information" clouds a reader's understanding of what a system description means. Disclosive transparency's subjective nature has rendered deep study into these problems and their remedies difficult. To improve this state of affairs, We introduce neural language model-based probabilistic metrics to directly model disclosive transparency, and demonstrate that they correlate with user and expert opinions of system transparency, making them a valid objective proxy. Finally, we demonstrate the use of these metrics in a pilot study quantifying the relationships between transparency, confusion, and user perceptions in a corpus of real NLP system descriptions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2021.
Builds on
18 of 43 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
- 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
- 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
- 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
- 2019Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligencecited by 78
6 more
- 2020Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and Needscited by 73
- 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 66
- 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
- 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
- 2020Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understandingcited by 10
- 2019Robust Estimation of Hypernasality in Dysarthria with Acoustic Model Likelihood Featurescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesiscited by 18
- 2024ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?cited by 17
- 2023Users are the North Star for AI Transparencycited by 5
- 2023Gradient-Based Word Substitution for Obstinate Adversarial Examples Generation in Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?26 Mar 2024
- 2023Gradient-Based Word Substitution for Obstinate Adversarial Examples Generation in Language Models24 Jul 2023
- 2023Users are the North Star for AI Transparency9 Mar 2023
- 2022Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesis10 Oct 2022