mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions

arXiv 2101.00433 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Broader disclosive transparency-truth and clarity in communication regarding the function of AI systems-is widely considered desirable. Unfortunately, it is a nebulous concept, difficult to both define and quantify. This is problematic, as previous work has demonstrated possible trade-offs and negative consequences to disclosive transparency, such as a confusion effect, where "too much information" clouds a reader's understanding of what a system description means. Disclosive transparency's subjective nature has rendered deep study into these problems and their remedies difficult. To improve this state of affairs, We introduce neural language model-based probabilistic metrics to directly model disclosive transparency, and demonstrate that they correlate with user and expert opinions of system transparency, making them a valid objective proxy. Finally, we demonstrate the use of these metrics in a pilot study quantifying the relationships between transparency, confusion, and user perceptions in a corpus of real NLP system descriptions.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2021.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  5. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  6. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  7. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  8. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  9. 2018Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarshipcited by 107
  10. 2018The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standardscited by 97
  11. 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
  12. 2019Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligencecited by 78
6 more
  1. 2020Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and Needscited by 73
  2. 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 66
  3. 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
  4. 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
  5. 2020Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understandingcited by 10
  6. 2019Robust Estimation of Hypernasality in Dysarthria with Acoustic Model Likelihood Featurescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.